Talk:Personnel Armor System for Ground Troops

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Associated task forces (general topics): Military technology and engineering task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): United States military history task force

[edit] threat level of vest

What is the threat level of the PASGT Vest?

I believe it is IIIA

Hell no. PASGT vests are more along the lines of IIA if that. Modern stuff like the IBA is IIIA. Kensai Max 21:34, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

The slang term is "K-Pot," not "K-pod." This refers to the transition from the "Steel pot," the slang term for the steel helmet.

The above reflects my experience during the past 10 years. "K-pod" is a term I have never encountered, but it does sound like a reasonable explanation if someone misunderstands what the speaker is referring to. The article has been changed to reflect the actual term. Gahread 08:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I fixed it bye going to ask and geting all kinda info

--Abramsgavin 07:48, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] No, you did not

I have reviewed your latest edits and grew suspicion of some the language use. To no surprise to me, it seems that some text (at least the part I investigated) came from this page. Edits and improvements are always encouraged but plagarism and copyright violations is not tolerated on wikipedia. I have reverted the article to my last version.--Kevin586 17:43, 23 July 2007 (UTC)