Talk:Perfection (song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Perfection (song) has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
April 17, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
Flag
Portal
 Perfection (song) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music. See also P:AUSMUSIC.
Assessment comments
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.

[edit] Track times?

Does anyone know the track times for:

  1. "Perfection" (Ruff Diamond remix)
  2. "Perfection" (Seamas Haji & Emmanuel instrumental)

-- Underneath-it-All 01:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Dannii-Perfection.jpg

Image:Dannii-Perfection.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Review

Looks pretty good! A few suggestions:

  • The article is on the short side. Hopefully some of my suggestions below can help beef it up a little bit.
  • The lead needs to be expanded a bit to summarize all the major sections.
  • UK should be spelled out the first time mentioned.
  • The AMG review kind of comes out of nowhere. Ideally, there should be a critical reception section for stuff like that. I'd also like to hear a bit more from other (perhaps less critical) critics.
  • "selling 7,717 copies." should give a time frame, I think.
  • "The the song was also successful" two "the"'s
  • The "Formats and track listings" and "Personnel" sections should use a medium dash (–) not the small dash. The External links should have a long one (I think, maybe it's medium).
  • MVDBase is not considered a reliable source.

And that's it! I've put the article on hold, which gives you 7 days. Let me know when you think you've addressed my concerns. Drewcifer (talk) 23:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

I think I've added your suggestions into the article. I have searched everywhere for more reviews, but can't find any. -- Underneath-it-All (talk) 02:53, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Looks good to me! Too bad about the lack of reviews, but I guess it's pretty hard to find reviews of individual songs. Anyways, good work! Drewcifer (talk) 04:22, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks again! -- Underneath-it-All (talk) 17:11, 17 April 2008 (UTC)