Talk:Peregrine Systems
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. | |
| Stub | rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
"Peregrine has sustained a rich tradition of delivering solutions with superior functionality to a broad segment of the global enterprise customer market. "
- That line does not sound NPOV to me - it reads more like an advertisement. Can we reword this to make it more encyclopedic/informative and less marketing oriented? -Armaced 21:46, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
"Our asset and service management offerings – ranging from Asset..." Since when does Wikipedia offer asset and service management solutions? This line is obviously taken directly from Peregrine's website. In fact, here is the link [1]. This page is supposed to inform readers of the existence of Peregrine Systems, and perhaps their place in the market or their history. It is not supposed to be an advertisement for the company. I know it is a subtle difference between informitive and persuasive, but this article isn't even making an effort. -Armaced 15:52, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] URL is broken
The URL pointing to http://www.sandreas.de/wiki/index.php/Main_Page is broken
try www.sandreas.de , wikipedia is now inside
[edit] Helpdesk Software
Not sure, but Helpdesk software is in my opinion the wrong wording , because Servicecenter is focused on supporting ITIL Service Management ...
I agree
[edit] Content Quality
This page seems rather blatantly targetted at the financial fraud of the company rather than the company itself. I would think that Peregrine's contributions would also include mention of things like Remedy, Tivoli, Harbinger, Loran, and all the other companies that were purchased.
Instead the content seems focused on the quasi-libel. For example "Peregrine's leadership was compelled to cover up their schemes, all the while selling off their Peregrine stock" : as far as I know, only the financial misdeeds have been prosecuted, not the SEC investigations.
I'd definitely flag this article as in dispute: it appears to be written from the point of view of someone who lost their job or their savings in the Peregrine fiasco which, while large, was NOT the reason Arthur Andersen failed.
Agreed that this article seems to violate the NPOV policy. Bc183 01:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
expanded product information to more accurately reflect the full product line, also Peregrine were a company that acquired most (but not all) of their technology, articulated this and the way it relates to the collpase of the organisation,
added some background on when the logo was launched and what the design represents, should it still be deleted ?
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Peregrine IT Asset and Service Management.gif
Image:Peregrine IT Asset and Service Management.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
