People v. LaValle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| People v. LaValle | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
||||||||
| June 24, 2004 | ||||||||
|
||||||||
| Holding | ||||||||
| The current statute of capital punishment in the state of New York was declared unconstitutional as it violated article one, section six of the state constitution. | ||||||||
| Court membership | ||||||||
|
||||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||||
|
||||||||
| Laws applied | ||||||||
| New York State Constitution article one, section six |
People v. LaValle (3 N.Y.3d 88) was a landmark decision by the New York Court of Appeals, the highest court in New York State, in which the court ruled that the state's death penalty statute was unconstitutional. The case was decided on June 24th, 2004.
[edit] Facts
Steven LaValle, who murdered high-school track coach Cynthia Quinn during her morning jog (the court states she was stabbed seventy-three times with a screwdriver) and then raped her, was convicted by a lower court of murder in the first degree and of rape. The Supreme Court of Suffolk County sentenced him to death. LaValle largely argued the case himself (despite a complete lack of legal training), after a falling out between him and his two attorneys. Each wanted to take the case in a separate direction. The case was eventually appealed to the highest court in New York State.
LaValle argued that his death sentence had been improperly imposed on two grounds. First, he alleged that one of the jurors (juror 16) had been biased against him from the beginning, and that during voir dire the juror had expressed an inclination towards assigning the death penalty to rapists and murderers. LaValle also argued that the emotional testimony of Quinn's husband was largely irrelevant to the case, and served only to earn him a harsher sentence from the jury.
While the court upheld LaValle's conviction, citing "overwhelming evidence of guilt" to support it (largely based on LaValle's own confession as well as eyewitness testimony), the court did invalidate the death sentence, on the grounds that it violated article one, section six of the New York Constitution.
The Court held that Section 400.27(10) [1] of the New York Criminal Procedure Law was unconstitutional. That section addressed what would happen if jury deadlocked, that is could not agree, on the penalty to be imposed, life without the possibility of parole or death. In that circumstance the trial judge would be empowered to sentence the defendant to as little as 20 years to life or as much as life without parole. Moreover, the statute required the judge to instruct the jury as to what would occur if they deadlocked.
The Court found that such an instruction could have a coercive effect on jurors who believed life without parole was the appropriate sentence, but feared that if they stuck to their vote and a deadlock resulted the defendant could get be eligible for parole in as little as twenty years. This potential for coercion violated the Due Process Clause of the New York State Constitution. The court further held that some instruction as to the consequence of deadlock was required by the due process clause of the New York State Constitution, but that it was for the legislature, not the court to provide a new instruction.
[edit] Effects
The court remanded the case to the Supreme Court of Suffolk County with instructions that a new sentence be imposed: either 20 or 25 years to life, or life imprisonment without eligibility for parole. The death sentences of New York's other two death-row inmates were also invalidated.
As of April, 2007, there have been talks by state officials of the Republican Party, notably State Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno, to reinstate a state death penalty that permits its usage for "cop-killers." Former governor Eliot Spitzer expressed agreement with the intention of the legislation, but did not actually express support for passing it. Current governor David Paterson has not taken a position.
In October 2007 The New York Court of Appeals decided People v. John Taylor [1] which involved the last inmate on New York's Death Row. In that case the District Attorney of Queens County sought to reverse the decision in Lavalle, but the court rejected that effort.
