Talk:Pennsylvania Route 222

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Pennsylvania Route 222 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
June 29, 2007 Good article nominee Listed

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Topics Pennsylvania State Highways GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments) Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. The map in this article is maintained by the Maps task force. Pennsylvania Route 222 is part of WikiProject Lehigh Valley, which is building a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Lehigh Valley region of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. To participate, you can edit the attached article, join or discuss the project. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Pennsylvania Portal Pennsylvania Route 222 is part of WikiProject Pennsylvania, which is building a comprehensive and detailed guide to Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. To participate, you can edit the attached article, join or discuss the project. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Successful good article nomination

I am glad to say that this article which was nominated for good article status has succeeded. This is how the article, as of July 3, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: The article is well written with correct spelling and proper grammar usage. The red-link to Cedar Creek Park should probably be removed if the park is not notable however.

2. Factually accurate?: Article is factually accurate.

3. Broad in coverage?: Yes, covers all major points including the history and description of the road.

4. Neutral point of view?: Written in an neutral point of view.

5. Article stability? Very stable. No edit wars and little vandalism.

6. Images?: Contains diagrams and maps which is enough for the article although an actual picture of the route may be helpful.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status. — --_Hdt83 ^Chat 19:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)