User talk:PEiP
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, PEiP, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Murderbike (talk) 02:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] February 2008
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to John Cena, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. LessThanClippers 19:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Yeah...and?
- Just your average, inexperienced Wiki user, focusing mainly on Heavy Metal articles.
If that's the case why did you dick around on my page? I already responded to your ignorant comment on my page and I wasn't even going to talk on your page at all, but I just had to check out some of your contribs after seeing your silly comment on my page (which you forgot to sign). So, what does a user who has made exactly 289 edits (at this time) have to warn me about? Apparently you don't know how wikipedia works. Anyways, I could go on, but what's the point? Machine Head is metalcore. Period. I can provide sources to back it up as well. Might I remind you to read WP:CAP at this time and to also provide edit summaries for your edits. As I looked up how many edits you had I couldn't help but notice that you do not provide edit summaries for about 99% of your edits. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 18:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Oh, please. The people who watch A Headbanger's Journey or w/e think the New Wave of American Heavy Metal is real and exists (and is a subgenre) which is, of course, total inane crap. I've never even watched it. And I don't care to. The only thing I ever saw of it was a few sections from it on black metal that a friend made me watch. Yeah, because I doubt I need a source. No one cares and everyone mostly agrees that Machine Head has elements of metalcore in their music. I could find a source, though, if I needed to. And how am I full of shit? Watch that WP:CIVIL there now. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 19:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Yes, but it doesn't matter what you or I say or think. It only matters what the sources say. That's the wikipedia way. Even if it sucks sometimes. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 19:59, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- ....You're right. I don't think either of us really care about this. I'm not even a fan of Machine Head. I personally don't like anything nu metal, groove metal or metalcore. I'm a fan of "real" metal. Yeah, AMG can be a bit retarded but I know I can source Machine Head being metalcore. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 20:19, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
I suppose groove metal is real metal, though a newer style of metal. I still detest it, though. I like many genres, as well but mostly older stuff. Jazz, blues, classic rock, soul, funk, classical, folk, metal (many styles; black, thrash, folk, Viking, doom, death, speed, power, etc. though mostly older), some electronica, and other things. Most recently I've become interested in a few nerdcore hip hop artists. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 20:43, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Nice. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 21:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Paradise Belongs to You
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Paradise Belongs to You, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.darklyrics.com/lyrics/saturnus/paradisebelongstoyou.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:16, 2 June 2008 (UTC)