Wikipedia:Peer review/The World Is Not Enough/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] The World Is Not Enough
This peer review discussion has been closed.
It's a Good Article.
Thanks, Ultra! 08:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)
A few pointers - it's a good starting point for FA though...
- Check external links, a least one dead one when I checked this.
- "(released in 1999)" no need for the parentheses.
- Don Black in the infobox points at a dab page.
- The Cast section could be expanded a bit to talk more about the characters.
- "James Bond(007):" space missing, and this sentence needs a full stop.
- Moneypenny and R's description need full stops.
- Image:Renard Elektra.png does not have a fair use rationale for use in this article.
- Sub image caption is a fragment so doesn't need full stop.
- "rumored" - okay, since this is a British film about a British secret agent I would advocate the use of British English.
- "The actual working title, as with all 007 movies was Bond 19 as it is always "Bond" followed by which number this Bond movie is." working title explanation ought to be introduced earlier and this sentence is clumsy.
- Try not to wedge text between images per WP:MOS#Images.
- Adaptations has only one references but makes a number of claims.
That's it for now. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:26, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- the term "(released in 1999)" should not be in parenthesis, usually only the date; not even sure why release date is mentioned, that is understood
- Phrase "highest grossing James Bond film at that time" need a new word choice, "to date" suggested.
- Plot should identify all characters by actor as in James Bond (Pierce Brosnan)
- Referencing variances throughout with inconsistency in dates, names
- The Rough Guide to James Bond, Death Rays, Jet Packs, Stunts & Supercars: The Fantastic Physics of Film's Most Celebrated Secret Agent and Film Fatales: Women in Espionage Films and Television, 1962-1973 should all appear as part of a bibliography not in the endnotes
That's it for now, generally well-written but minor revisions are required. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:43, 12 April 2008 (UTC).