Wikipedia:Peer review/San Diego Chargers seasons/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] San Diego Chargers seasons

Article (Edit|History) • Article talk (Edit|History) • Watch article • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I'm hopful I can get this to FL status.


Thanks,

Buc (talk) 18:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)

  • en-dash should be used for score separators.
  • None of the lead is cited and at five paragraphs it's too long.
    • Added some refs.
  • Weird to have two columns with identical content, regardless of the fact they wikilink to different article themes.
    • One is the NFL season the other is the teams season. Buc (talk) 17:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
      • I'm aware of this Buc, that's why I said "they wikilink to different article themes..." - I'm saying it's odd. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
        • Um...ok sorry about that. Buc (talk) 19:23, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Why is season column bold and team season not bold?
    • NFL season is more notable.
      • It's unclear to the reader why. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
        • The titles at the top tell you which is which. Buc (talk) 19:23, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
          • Featured lists need to be accessible to all, this is unclear, you have two identical columns which have identical contents besides where they wikilink to... The Rambling Man (talk) 19:32, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
            • Changed headings. Buc (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Some post-season results have citations, some don't. Need to be consistent.
    • See References at the bottem.
  • "(1960–2008, includes only playoffs)" - 2008? where's that on the table?
    • The 2007 season's playoffs took place in 2008.
  • Check punctuation on all footnotes.
  • Second EL was retrieved in the future.
    • Huh? Buc (talk) 17:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
      • He means the second reference says that it was retrieved in December of 2008 (it should be 2007).
        Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 20:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

The Rambling Man (talk) 18:47, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Think that's everything adressed. Anything else? Buc (talk) 18:30, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

  • A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 00:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)