Wikipedia:Peer review/Perverted-Justice.com/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Perverted-Justice.com

I've been tinkering with this article lately, and am interested in seeing how it could be improved further. A lot of people have very strong opinions about the organization in question, which has made keeping it NPOV difficult, but I think progress has been made. One area in particular I'm not sure how to deal with is that a lot of the critisism seems to be a little outdated, referring to previous issues that have been resolved (to whatever degree). Suggestions? Fieari 07:52, July 23, 2005 (UTC)

Please employ the {{note}} and {{ref}} system. Content wise: it could be good to counter the criticism with a mention of high-profile figures who support the site. I believe Bill O'Reilly is all for this sort of stuff...

Also, try to find out whether other countries have or are debating in Parliaments the possibility of introducing such sites. There has been a minor public debate about online sex-offender registries in Australia recently. Hope that helps. Harro5 07:27, July 26, 2005 (UTC)