Talk:Pedro I of Brazil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is a former featured article candidate. Please view its sub-page to see why the nomination did not succeed. For older candidates, please check the Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
Pedro I of Brazil is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Brazil and Brazil-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Top | This article has been rated as top-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
To-do list for Brazil:
|
|||
 |
Pedro I of Brazil is part of WikiProject Portugal, a project to improve all Portugal-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Portugal-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. |
|
Portugal To-do:
|
|
Contents |
[edit] Documenting moves to Pedro I of Brazil and Pedro II of Brazil
See discussion on Talk:Pedro II of Brazil.
[edit] Peer review
History of Portugal (1777-1834) is now being peer reviewed. Please, if you want, go there and state your opinion. Thank you. Gameiro 19:50, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
- Just to state that it is now a featured article candidate. You can support or oppose here. Thanks. Gameiro 01:54, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Siege of Porto
The article calls the Cerco do Porto "Porto's Wall", but I beleive "cerco" is meant as "siege". Is this a traditional english translation?... Wouldn't surprise me they like a strange transation, since in "Thelondon" they already like to call Porto "Oporto"... :) -- NIC1138 22:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Absolutist
How can an Absolutist Monarchy be held by a Constitution? If it has a Constituition it's not Absolutist.
And more, how can a Prince called "The Liberal" be an absolutist emperor? Please this must be changed, here in Brazil discussions made about Pedro's I monarchy are all saying he made a Constitutional Monarchy, calling him an Absolutist is outrageous. And please don't take your texts based on portuguese Wikipedia, it sucks, it's empty of references and it's usually based on hour Basical History Learning that is being contested since the end of the XX century, and most of books are beeing rewritten to show some truth.
Independent Brazil has never had an Absolutist Monarchy, and the reign of Dom Pedro I is really similar to Presidentialist system, where the Chief of State is the Chief of Government.
I'm not signed on wikipedia, so if someone here wants to contact me i'll give my page on Orkut: http://www.orkut.com/Profile.aspx?uid=3184544641264841604
189.32.158.41 (talk) 02:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- As no one has changed it or talked to me i'll change it myself. 189.32.158.41 (talk) 20:32, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
The reign of D. Pedro I was a constitucional Monarchy , because had a constitution.But in fact was a absolut monarchy. In the time of the Empire we had four powers.The tradicional 3 and one that hear was called "Poder Moderador" with this power D. Pedro I reigned without limits.Of course wasn't democratic in fact was a way that Pedro I found to reign without limits but was constitutional.It's complicated.
Augusto Fontes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.53.160.122 (talk) 23:32, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
