Talk:Pedra Branca dispute
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Unilateral move
The move may be problematic because it preempted discussion. __earth (Talk) 14:04, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Name
I recommend adopting the official name of the case, which is Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore), [1] in line with most ICJ cases at wikipedia. __earth (Talk) 14:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support, except that, following the convention at "List of International Court of Justice cases", it appears that the article name should be "Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia v. Singapore)". Would be happy if someone pointed out any relevant Manual of Style guideline on the matter, if any. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 21:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Why no straightforward solution?
Considering the smallish size of these rock islands, wouldn't it be simpler to just blow them up with a few hundred tons of TNT and get rid of the problem forever, rather then dragging a decades long legal dispute? If the islands are erased nobody has to gain or lose anything and creating conventional explosions up to 4 kilotons is a fairly easy job nowadays. 91.83.15.197 (talk) 22:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Alfons Åberg (talk) 00:35, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Talk pages aren't meant for discussing matters like this, but one brief answer is that it is of benefit to have sovereignty over any island as it extends a country's territorial waters. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 01:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)