Talk:PCD (album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the PCD (album) article.
Article policies

Contents

[edit] Album sales UK=

it sold 1.2 million album in the uk and if you want to see link look here [1] it sold 574,000 in 2005 and [2]533,000 in 2006! get your facts straight people


[edit] PCD2: Fired Up ???????

Where is this PCD2.... confirmed as thir next cd. this is untrue information, so i removed it. also, it sounds more like a movie not a cd. provide a link and i'll but back on thir page.

[edit] Beep remix?

The Beep remix with Snoop Dogg is currently listed as the final track (after the International bonus tracks), is this correct? Does any edition of PCD include this remix? --Design 13:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Album

If you mean the Buttons remix, a new version of the album was released in the UK (maybe other countries) with a bonus CD, featuring the Buttons remix with Snoop Dogg. However, not on the the original one. Hope this helps! Plus, I don't think their are any dance tracks on this album, so I don't know why Dance is featured in the genres.

[edit] Edit War

Please don't edit war, particularly with threats against the other side. I've temporarily blockedd the page. Sort it out here. Adam Cuerden talk 11:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

There is nothing to sort out. The page is okay how it looks right now. - Noboyo, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

The genre should fit in with the bands article, and as it is it dosent. Noboyo is pathetic and edits just to start edit wars. JJH1992 23:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm neither pathetic nor do i edit just to start edit wars (I've been here for 1 1/2 years now!) ... 5 different genres just don't define the sound of an album - and JJH1992's use of < br > blemishs the infobox. Noboyo, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

There are four different genres, and the genres fit in with the genres on all PCD articles:

Pop R&B Hip Hop Dance

< br > makes the infobox look tidy, the commas and lists make it look terrible. There was an edit war a while ago and the genres as they appear above were selected. I too have been here for around (1-2) years and I think that you are pathetic. JJH1992 18:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Right. I think both of you need to calm down. You're at each other's throats over a minor formatting issue in an infobox, after all. Why not use WP:RFC to ask other people's opinions, and agree to be governed by, say, a poll, or other productive way to move forward? Adam Cuerden talk 18:25, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes, lets calm down and focus on the real heart of the issue. Is this just a formatting issue or is there disagreement over the genres as well? Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review!
You know, I've always been politely and correct (I didn't send messages like "Noboyo, leave alone now or I will request you be blocked"), yeah, I'm cool with every senseful change, but .... I just don't see any sense behind JJH1992 changes since they don't orient by other wikipedia pages. It's no personal matter, I'd do the same with every other user. - Noboyo
I just think this article should fit in with the bands article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JJH1992 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC).
It says this album was a "critical and commercial success", but there's only one review and it's average, and the link beside this statement links to some unrelated article...Leemorrison 17:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] not a critical success

I changed "was a critical and commercial success" to "was a commercial success" because it wasn't actually a critical success. It had no major reviews, and its minor ones were mixed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by QuirkyAndSuch (talk • contribs) 04:59, 12 November 2007 (UTC)