User:Paul EJ King

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Not my first time here

I was actually under a different user account user:pking123, until I found you could put spaces in your username. Check user:pking123 to find out what my early contributions were. Paul EJ King 01:49, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paul King


B. Sc., B. Ed.
High School Teacher
Oakville, Ontario
author of the Food Science Website

[edit] Contributed to the Philosophy of History Article

(the "Historical accounts of writing history" subsection). I cleaned it up rather than change any existing information. I discovered some deadwood phrases -- things that were obvious to the point of being non-statements. The topic greatly interests me, because I am personally involved in a bit of "historical revisionism" of my own. --Paul EJ King 13:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Contributed to the Chemistry page,

expanding the precis on the History of Chemistry, with a quote taken from William Brock's The Fontana History of Chemistry. The history of chemistry is not striaghtforward and linear. It is caught up with otherwise respected scientists, royalty, popes, and idle rich folk. It is linked to Europe's need to become healthy again after being rocked by plagues, blights, and so on (which I don't mention). It is also linked to the Dark Ages, the Renaissance, and the development of a scientific method and a philosphy of science generally.

I thought that at the very least, we should state: 1) alchemy; 2) how alchemy revealed a need for a more systematic way of finding things out; and 3) the emergence of chemistry as the culmination of organised, meticulous and reproducible experiments. --Paul EJ King 13:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Contributed to History of Chemistry page

and I had to give a history of alchemy that led to chemistry. It was not clear to me that the existing alchemy article did that, so it was done here. The article as it stood previously gave the history starting from Lavoisier without context, and the Alchemy article, which explored the protoscience itself, was of little help. It seemed to encapsulate the topic in its own little universe. There needed to be a sense, once again, of evolution. --Paul EJ King 01:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Started the article on Multifactorial inheritance

Added a flurry of edits and refs to the article. Tried to keep the treatment basic and general. I also started a talk page (talk:Multifactorial Inheritance) on the subject to get the ball rolling. --Paul EJ King 13:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Other General remarks