Talk:Pauline Johnson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

↓    Skip to table of contents    ↓

	Pauline Johnson has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Article milestones Date Process Result December 22, 2006 WikiProject peer review Reviewed December 27, 2006 Peer review Reviewed January 5, 2007 Good article nominee Listed Current Status: Good article

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America (Rated GA-Class) This article is part of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, which collaborates on Native American, First Nations, Inuit, Métis and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. Suggested article edit guidelines: To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification. Before assessing this article, be sure to check the existing Archive of assessments made under the previous system (used until July 2006), and feel free to help in migrating the existing comments besides from adding your own evaluation. After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there. This article has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it needs. WikiProject Vancouver      (Rated GA-Class) Vancouver Portal This article is part of WikiProject Vancouver, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and the surrounding metropolitan area. To participate, edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments. WikiProject Canada / British Columbia (Rated GA-Class) Canada Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. British Columbia Portal This article is part of the British Columbia WikiProject (Discuss/Join). WikiProject Biography     (Rated GA-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] More information about this article... This article has had a peer review by the Biography WikiProject, which has now been archived.

Pauline Johnson is a Showcase Biography for the Vancouver Portal. It; (or a previous version of it) has been identified as a noteworthy article for display relating to Vancouver. Please feel free to visit the portal for more information.

Contents 1 W. J. Keith quote 2 Siwash Rock 3 Citation style 4 GA Nomination

[edit] W. J. Keith quote

I've restored the W. J. Keith quote that was deleted. It seems to help illustrate the differences of opinion mentioned in the "Criticism and Influence" section, and its source is cited, so I don't see how it could be considered not valid. Andrew Sly 22:14, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Siwash Rock

Siwash Rock is the subject of one of the best of Johnson's Legends of Vancouver collection of stories; the tale is about virtue, and about resolve on its behalf in the face of certain death and the implacable will of the divine. It never occurred to me before reading this article why it was that her monument was near it...or is it? I have it in my head that it's over by Brockton Point, which is on the opposite side of the park...just checked the Wiki page but it and other monuments in the park are not listed, and they're not listed on the Parks Board website page either; nor is there a map, or much in the way of history at that site....hmmmmm....I'll be back.Skookum1 07:37, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Apparently it's at Ferguson Point somewhere, by the restaurant. She reqested to be buried within sight of the rock. Curiously, she also requested that no monument be erected in her honour.Bobanny 09:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Citation style

this article is currently undergoing reviews. The original writer used the author/date style, which I formatted according to Wikipedia conventions for Harvard referencing, and it conforms to the WP:MOS as it is. However, everyone, including me, seems to prefer the usual Chicago style, the one with footnotes at the bottom in a "references" section. Seems the smart thing might be to just change it, though it's a faux pas to do that to an existing style without a consensus on the talk page first. Any thoughts? Bobanny 00:37, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Thinking again, Harvard style is also acceptable per WP:MOS. Personally, I do not adore it, but it is acceptable!--Yannismarou 15:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Nomination

• Passes good article status (WP:GA?). Article tag changed, good article list updated (WP:GOOD). Well written, well referenced. →James Kidd (contr/talk/email) 21:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
  • There's only one footnote. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 22:19, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

You're correct, however there are several references, see: the references. What are you getting at? →James Kidd (contr/talk/email) 22:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Yup, I think changing the refs to footnotes is definately the way to go, not to make it more correct, but because that's what most people apparently prefer on Wikipedia (including me - see above comments). Thanks for the review, James. I still plan on addressing some content issues that were raised in a biography project peer review, and will eventually try for an fac, when I get a chance to go to the library and some extra time. Bobanny 06:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Good luck! Looks like you're on the right track →James Kidd (contr/talk/email) 06:19, 12 January 2007 (UTC)