Talk:Paul Voermans

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

Portal	Paul Voermans is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian literature.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Australia literature may be able to help!
	The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

The following sentence seems ambiguous to me: Without heavy scientific element, this work could be considered slipstream fiction written from the "inside" of the field.

Does it mean that the book lacks any "heavy scientific element" and can therefore be considered slipstream? Or does it mean that the book could have been considered slipstream but for having a heavy scientific element? (I can't remember the book well enough to disambiguate based on my own knowledge of it.) Metamagician3000 14:27, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Though such memory as I have suggests that the former meaning was intended. Yes? No? Metamagician3000 14:28, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

I preferred the other photo, the Easter 2006 one, but I'm biased I guess. ;) Metamagician3000 06:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 00:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)