Talk:Paul McKenna/Comments
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Article Bias
In my opinion this article is biased.
It appears to claim that Mr McKenna has been sued and has always been successful in defending his 'profession' and 'standing'.
In fact - some time ago I offered some information, backed by the details of the case about him losing a case and having to pay damages and costs.
I have submitted this information twice and have yet to see it displayed.
Why have my offers to represent an alternative view of this man (who appears to have an abnormally strong drive to appear 'squeaky clean')not been taken up??
Ivywall
