Talk:Paul London and Brian Kendrick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paul London and Brian Kendrick article.
Article policies
Comment This article is a frequent target for editors to add a week-by-week synopsis of storyline events, unconfirmed information, rumors, and other content inappropriate to an encyclopedic article. Please make sure to familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not, and consider whether your additions to this article will serve to make the article larger and harder to edit for style, clarity, and grammar.
WikiProject Professional wrestling
Professional wrestling
Portal
Paul London and Brian Kendrick is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Discussion

Have they done the 'Get Well Soon' in this run? I haven't seen ALL their matches, but I've seen quite a few and don't recall it. Tromboneguy0186 18:19, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

they havent used it except for the first match that they returned as a team on WWE Velocity. However, they often used the move to finish matches in their initial run in the tag division ---Paulley 20:21, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Trivia

It says they've only faced each other once since they started teaming, but I could have sworn the fatal 4 way took place after they became a team.

I think it was talking about one-on-one action. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.31.109.163 (talk) 19:49, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Redundancy and Trivia

I don't think the championship list is necessary, for goodness sake it's only got one thing in it. The history section already mentions their title win. Also see Wikipedia:Embedded lists, which states that lists make Wikipedia worse, not better. --Jtalledo (talk) 19:24, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Also, trivia sections are generally bad form, see WP:AVTRIV. --Jtalledo (talk) 19:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
But its in every other wrestler/tag team bio on wikipedia, i just dont think we can get rid of it on one and leave it on others... i mean are we goin to go remove the titles section from the Dudley Boyz article now.... as for Trivia the only reason its their is because we got fed up of reverting the Hooliganz comment every three hours --- Paulley 19:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
lol Just because it's on every other one doesn't mean it's good form and it clearly runs counter to the style guide. I suppose we could leave it, although it still doesn't make too much sense to have a list with one already mentioned bit of info in it. --Jtalledo (talk) 19:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spanky

Hello everyone. On a page for a pro wrestling stable Triple X there is a person who went by 2 ring names (Senshi-Low Ki) On that page in the members section the 2 ring names are seperated by one of these "/" So, I thought since Brian Kendrick preformed as Brian Kendrick and Spanky, I thought it'd be ok for me to put /Spanky after Kendrick in the members section. =======

[edit] Team Name

I thought they were reffered to as Gemini at one point, when they wore masks 80.229.169.189 10:55, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

No, the Gymini were a completley different team. But the night on Smackdown they debuted the mask attire they were attacked by the Gymini. ===

I've never heard them being refered to as Londrick on tv, I thought the IWC made it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.171.63 (talk) 01:56, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Indeed, and I'd like to raise into question the officialness of "HooliganZ" as well, especially as it appears nowhere in the article prose. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 18:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] PWI

It says that they were the PWI 2006 Tag Team of the Year, but the wiki page for PWI says they were first runner up. Styles and Daniels won.Kirby17 05:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Nevermind. I read the year wrong in the article. I'd delete this, but I'm not sure how.Kirby17 05:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] World Tag Team Champions

Here's proof that they're the new World Tag Team Champions - a picture taken by a fan in attendance in Cape Town. [1] Steveweiser 23:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

I know it has been confirmed, but so far WWE isn't acknowledging it, so I don't think it will be officially recognized. Most likely Cade and Murdoch will get the titles back before they come back to the US. It was most likely an extra treat for the fans over there. Just have to wait and see. --Zii_XFS 19:54, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

for the LAST time. They are NOT the world tag champs. wwe.com is a more reliable source than wrestleview.com in that case. If wwe.com says they are not champs, they just are not champs. and thats the bottom line. Diivoo 09:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

It was a World Tag Team Title match, and they won. WWE just hasn't announced it yet because they want to save it for when RAW airs. Can't wait until it they show the result on TV and you people will have no choice but to get over yourselves. Also, the title history here lists The Rockers title win that got reversed, so you have to list this, as it is an actually title win that will not be reversed. Can't have a double standard just because this title change happened in the "whiny pricks who feel important patrolling a web page" era. Just watch RAW tomorrow, high and mightys. Max85

maybe you should take a look at this WP:CIVIL and if it is aired tomorrow, then we can wait till tomorrow and add it then. Diivoo 20:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

I believe this is what everyone has been waiting for. --Naha|(talk) 23:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

There, now you finally have to give in and add it, plus the change back. Max85 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Max85 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

I didn't provide the link so "somebody could be right and somebody could be wrong." Please remain civil. As you can see here, you, as well as everyone else, didn't "know everything" as you seem to have stated that L&K would be announced as the champs on RAW on Monday. Obviously this is not the case as Cade and Murdoch won the titles back. In the future, please let events play out, wait for confirmation from reliable sources, and do not make demands of other Wikipedians. There should never be a rush to first add information to articles and then search for credible sources. Thanks, --Naha|(talk) 00:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chit Chat featuring: (The Hooliganz) Paul London & Brian Kendrick

London & Kendrick have been through alot they have also won many opportunities that have been nothing but, cheats and unfair matches.The W.W.E has agreed to give them less matches on RAW that is why they should be on SMACKDOWN instead they were champions and many people loved their highflying moves.On RAW they don't do much.The only exciting match really on RAW was with Jeff Hardy.London & Kendrick are also known as the Rockers of today but, many people will know them as the exciting troublemakers of today(other than DX).London and Kendrick will hopefully be drafted to Smackdown again or maybe even ECW they deserve to get drafted their ,so they could be even more highflying and Extreme.They can also have Kelly Kelly as their manager who knows.If they don't get drafted to Smackdown or ECW then either they don't want to or they have something up their sleeves.Londrick hopefully still have the longest streak in holding their wwe tag team championships.I hope John Morrison and The Miz won't end up having the longest streak ever to hold the WWE Tag Team Championships.Brian Kendrick turns 29.Paul London turns 28.I also think Paul might have a chance with Kelly Kelly if he's drafted to ECW. [www.cruiserweightchaosonline.com] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.135.25 (talk) 20:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Right and relevant to/helping this article how exactly? I'm sorry, but wikipedia is not a forum. This isn't the place for your opinions or thoughts. This page is to be used to discuss improvements that can be made to the article. Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 16:22, 7 June 2008 (UTC)