Talk:Paul Ingram

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paul Ingram article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

This article was nominated for deletion in the past. The result of the discussion was keep.

An obvious apologetic piece. Finding neutral sources on Paul Ingram is difficult. --Ryan Delaney ^talk 00:03, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

I see the issue (so I've not removed the NPOV tag). While I personally believe that Ingram was falsely accused, I've strived to keep my contributions NPOV. I hope future editors can catch anything I've missed.

But the problem is that the main evidence against Ingram were his MANY confessions and his guilty plea, which are mentioned in the stub.

And while you are right about finding neutral sources on Ingram, we put the entire Audio Pardon Hearing (including sheriff Gary Edwards and deputy prosecutor Gary Tabor who both testified against Ingram) online. And this is linked in the external links here.

But merely placing someone in the category of Wrongfully convicted people seems to violate the NPOV. I've suggested some more neutral terms at talk:Wrongfully convicted people, where this issue should be discussed. --DougHill 04:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Clean up

This article needs some cleanup. The notes section is a little funny and needs to get converted into some useful summary info and references. Let's try to keep all information WP:NPOV, i.e., stick to the facts where they are undisputed. When undisputed, attempt to present both sides. Daniel Santos (talk) 01:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC)