Talk:Paul Horowitz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

	Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ]
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.
Help with this template Please rate this article, and then leave comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify its strengths and weaknesses.

[edit] Signal v. Noise

There seems to be some POV pushing here in declaring the 37 events as noise rather than signal. If Horowitz himself has used the term "signal" that's one thing, but it may just be what the science press used for simplicity's sake. Does anyone have a direct quote from Horowitz? As it is, I'm rewriting the counterclaim as an attributed claim rather than in the Wikipedia voice. --Dhartung | Talk 22:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC)