Talk:Paul Diwakar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
More information about this article...
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject India because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WP India}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WP India}} template, removing {{WP India}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.



A separate bio for Diwakar is relevant since his work in various organisations is closely linked to his background as a dalit and christian. --Husager 14:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

I have again reverted a deletion by user Benjamin P. Holder (talk • contribs). He has deleted the article citing lack of notability as the reason, but has not followed the guidelines put forward in WP:Notability. I have now put the {{notability}} tag on the page, and would like comments from Benjamin P. Holder and other editors as to why the article should be deleted. As stated above I think the article is relevant on it's own. --Husager 14:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] notability and reliable sources

The subject of the article is likely notable enough, but needs additional reliable sources to be referenced. There seem to be substantial news articles with the subject, but the few I tried to look at were either minor coverage, or not available online. --Rocksanddirt 23:12, 22 October 2007 (UTC)