User talk:Patw06
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A tag has been placed on Oldenburg Academy of the Immaculate Conception, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Who are you? I do not appreciate you editing my user pages. Please stop. Colonelx 01:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
You know who i am. Please stop deleting my pages if there is nothing wrong with them. That is all i am asking you to do. Also, I have not edited your page. Check my contributions if you don't believe me.
Please delete your Oldenburg Academy Article. IT is useless.
There is nothing wrong with it. It contributes to society. It is still in progress and needs some work. Patw06 18:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
How does it contribute? It offers next to no important information. You should have typed up a large portion of the article before publishing it. Colonelx 23:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] May 2007 (reply)
I did not vandalize this page. The page read, "you all suck like my ass", and i placed it under vandalism. Check my contribs if you don't believe me.
- Oh, sorry. My mistake. vLaDsINgEr 01:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Explain what? I saw the page and thought it had been newly created and placed for deletion instead of reverting it. My mistake. I did not, however, vandalize it.
- I believe it was completely accidental, User:Cailil. This user was attempting to revert vandalism when the revert by MartinBot was reverted. I did something similar a couple days ago.vLaDsINgEr 01:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- If its a mistake fair enough. You should always review histories if you're tagging pages for deletion. There could be an edit war or a case of vandalism going on there. Its usually best to start a discussion on the article's talk page before tagging it for deletion. Sorry if I bit your head off - we all make mistakes :)--Cailil talk 01:19, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- Sorry, I will be more careful in the future. Thank you for your advice. Patw06 02:09, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
