Talk:Patty Larkin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.
This article is part of WikiProject Iowa, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Iowa.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 20:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] sexual orientation

Earlier when this article was included in two new categories, "Lesbian musicians" and "LGBT people from the United States", I reverted the edit simply because it was unsourced. Although a fan of Ms. Larkin, I had missed that particular fact about her and thought that it should require a source before placing it there; after all, there is a difference between "out" and "outed".

Sources were provided, but now it simply a statement in the article, "She is openly lesbian". I have no problem with that fact, but is the statement itself germane to the article? It seems to be irrelevant to the rest of the article, and should either be elaborated upon as to its particular importance, integrated into another portion of the article to define its relevance to her music, or removed. As is, it seems like a trivia factoid.

-- Couillaud (talk) 16:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree that it's sort of a hanging factoid. This is not to say it's unimportant, but any long-time fan of Larkin might not have any idea about her sexual orientation, as it doesn't seem to be a subject of her songwriting or any of her public conversation. I'm still fine with the article's categorization, but unless there's at least a second and third sentence to add about this, I don't think it's relevant. Mitchell k dwyer (talk) 18:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


Then until such time as someone can come up with something specific (like it being a large influence on her art or part of her political activism), it should be treated as a "hanging factoid" (I like that term, much better than my own "trivia factoid"), and I have moved the reference to External links (it's a good review of Red=Luck) and removed the single sentence. -- Couillaud (talk) 19:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
I think that was a good call. -MrFizyx (talk) 16:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)