Talk:Patrick Air Force Base

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: `<!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -->` `\|B-Class-1=yes/no` `<!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. -->` `\|B-Class-2=yes/no` `<!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->` `\|B-Class-3=yes/no` `<!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->` `\|B-Class-4=yes/no` `<!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->` `\|B-Class-5=yes/no`
Associated task forces (general topics):
	Military aviation task force
Associated task forces (nations and regions):
	United States military history task force

[edit] New "Related content" subsection

I'm not too wild about this new subsection header. There are other editors, including Nyttend, dicussing this with the editor. Hope to have this resolved the week after Thanksgiving 2007. Student7 (talk) 01:15, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

How about "Internal links"... "See also"... "Other topics"... "Associated topics"... but not External links.... nav boxes are not External links. LanceBarber (talk) 01:51, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

You have a good point about potential confusion. Maybe should be discussed at a higher level forum? Student7 (talk) 02:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)