User talk:Pastordonn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:Mansfield christian school logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mansfield christian school logo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Daniel Roemer

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Daniel Roemer, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.danielroemer.com/about.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 20:36, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Daniel Roemer

A tag has been placed on Daniel Roemer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g12.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. — madman bum and angel 23:12, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Daniel Roemer

A tag has been placed on Daniel Roemer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g12.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. — madman bum and angel 00:47, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Daniel Roemer

A tag has been placed on Daniel Roemer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g12.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. — madman bum and angel 17:13, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyvios

I've blocked you do to repeated submissions of copyright violations. Wizardman 17:22, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Based on your e-mail, I would not mind giving you another chance, since it wasn't a complete copyvio, just very similar. The fact that it had been deleted as a copyvio a couple times before worried me though. We do try and take copyright seriously. What you could do is make the article with some parts from it, and just use inline citations in them, showing that you're using some sections from them. This way everything's cited, it's original work, and not a copyvio. If you're not sure if something's right or not drop me a line. Wizardman 01:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Robbersroost2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Robbersroost2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:16, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome / Problem with one of your images

Welcome!

Hello, Pastordonn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! ˉˉanetode╦╩ 22:30, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Robbersroostge.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Robbersroostge.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 22:30, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

In the context of Wikipedia policy, "replaceable" means that a possibility of creating a free equivalent exists. While no one expects you to rent a helicopter and take an alternate photograph, a Wikipedian at some point in time might have the opportunity to take an adequate photo of this geographic location. The reasoning behind such a strict policy is that it encourages the creation of free content by excluding fair use claims based on convenience. Regards, ˉˉanetode╦╩ 23:34, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] prod warning

[edit] Daniel Roemer

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Daniel Roemer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Blahblahme 16:51, 20 September 2007 (UTC)