User talk:Paste
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia - some useful links for you
Welcome!
Hello, Paste, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
Put references in [1] tags, and then add a
tag at the bottom where you want the notes to appear.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! DuncanHill 13:55, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] HMS Ariadne
No problem at all. I tend to edit quite heavily on Royal Navy ships, I'm working my way through the light cruiser classes at the moment, but once yours popped up in the new articles feed I thought I'd give it a bit of an overhaul. If you like the subject, Wikiproject:Ships is a good place to go for resources, templates, etc, as well as to chat about things, ask for advice, etc. But anyway, happy to help out. Kind regards, Benea 11:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Cheeks1955
Just checking if my account works. Cheeks1955 10:32, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hello
I'm the editor of Amir Khan (boxer)'s page and would like to say that your contribution was identified as vandalism. Hope you understand. Lil'Khan 05:36, 27 October 2007 (UTC) (Editor of the page) Ok!You wrote that he is from some Hassan...Clan when he is not he is a Janjua Rajput sorry for calling you a vandal.Lil'Khan 18:00, 27 October 2007 (UTC) Sorry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lil'Khan (talk • contribs) 18:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Jessica Moon
Clarifying .... I was restoring the db-bio tag and adding holdon as Lil'Khan had removed the db-bio tag ... i.e. a procedural step. I edit conflicted with you and finished the edit with my edit. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
(following from your response) I think the best course right now is to keep aware of Lil'Khan's activities and assiduously document them on the User's talk page so as to support any needed action later. I'm hoping that the Lil'Khan is just having a bad day and will be on a better path tomorrow (or next editing session). --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] List of James Bond novels
This, like all good lists, needs separate sections for each category of novels. I have created sections. If you can transfer info there it'll be appreciated. Vikrant Phadkay 15:01, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "Brain dead"
Heh, sorry. I meant that comment about myself for screwing up a simple redirect. Not you--your actions were totally appropriate. Sorry about that. Torc2 19:18, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Département de défense
Département de défense is asta la bye-bye. - BillCJ 18:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hastings
Thanks for the note. Regarding whether or not an article specifically focused on Hastings Town Centre is appropriate, I don't disbelieve what you've said. I removed the tag, though, since it was not a clear violation of any of the criteria for speedy deletion. Additionally, while I'm unfamiliar with Hastings itself, I've lived in areas where articles on the town centre (or plaza, town square, or the equivalent) would be appropriate and meet notability requirements.
In any case, if you'd care to pursue the matter, I would suggest starting an AfD on the article. I think you have good reasons to do so, but speedy deletions are reserved for cases where there is little to no question of the appropriateness of an article. Tijuana Brass 21:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Skull Valley Elementary School District
[edit] Invite to discuss goals for WP:Golf
You are invited. Go to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Golf#Goals. michfan2123 15:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hassocks Golf Club
The article was deleted because it appeared to be an advertisement. Articles that contain little else but a listing of prices and the company's website are often deleted as such. If you want to recreate the article, using citations from reliable sources that attest to the golf club's notability, you are more than welcome to do so. -- Merope 16:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- I replied to your note on my talk page. Martijn Hoekstra 17:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Theatr felinfach
Arguably a bit borderline; there was so little context I couldn't even be sure the article was genuine.
Would you like me to undelete to userspace so it can be worked on a bit more? I would recommend fixing the name of the final article, though (capitalizing). — Coren (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Theatr Felin-fach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. UtherSRG (talk) 16:54, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: SOLO
The article is clearly not unsalvageable spam (which was the reason you cited for deletion). east.718 at 19:51, November 20, 2007
- {{ad}}, {{notability}}, and {{coi}} can be useful... if the issue is urgent you can always nominate the article for deletion.
[edit] Robert Lambton
There's a difference between an assertion of notability and Wikipedia subject notability. Speedy deletion (CSD A7) can only be used when an assertion of notability for the subject has not been made. In this case, an assertion has been made (Lambton won the U14 National Youth Omnium). Therefore, I had to decline the speedy deletion request. However, I felt the article was not in itself notable according to Wikipedia guidelines, so I sent the article to AfD to see if others agree that the subject does not meet WP:BIO. Nishkid64 (talk) 18:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- I've tagged it. You have four days to build up Robert Lambton. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 01:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] New Forest
I am wondering why you removed the Hampshire templates from New Forest and substituted Wiltshire ones? I believe the forest was once in Dorset but it is now almost entirely in Hampshire.--Charles (talk) 17:05, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Apologies. On closer inspection it was Suicidalhampster who put on the Wilts tags. I have left it as Hants.--Charles (talk) 22:24, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Gussethunters
Sorry, I missread the diff on lupin's anti vandal tool. ffm 23:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Why re-edit...
Sorry I re-editted the changes you made. This is my first ever attempt at a Wiki page and at that point I had not read the instruction to put dates within square brackets. I wasn't sure where they had come from and thought they were simply wrong.
Also because I am a newbie, I'm not sure if this is the right way to reply to the message you sent me. So apologies if I'm fumbling around here! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronnie turford (talk • contribs) 13:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind reply Ronnie Turford (talk) 12:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] re James Baird
Thanks for your comment at my talkpage. In answer, yes. It is badly written, possibly by the subject - which gives a conflict of interest - but it does establish notability. The subject has been employed by a (couple of) professional football club(s). WP:CSD is not suitable for a subject that establishes notability. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:36, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
I declined the 2nd speedy deletion on this as it is not nonsense-- just badly written. Bad writing is fixable by good writing rather than deletion. Also, It took like 50 seconds for me to come up with verifiable sources asserting that subject is a pro footballer. You might want to nominate this at AfD, but it is not a candidate for speedy deletion. Dlohcierekim 14:58, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reply
The handy-dandy link to Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria that I provided in the edit summary should fill you in on what you need to know about non-free content. Using that image in the infobox specifically fails point 1 of the criteria. It also fails point 12 of Wikipedia:Non-free content#Unacceptable images in that it is a replaceable fair-use image of a living person. Images in infoboxes are always used for identification purposes (i.e. "This is what the subject of this article looks like"). Fair-use images that are used to, as you say, show "subject playing her most well known character" are absolutely allowed, provided that they are located in the body of the article and support significant text regarding the image. That means you need more than "She is known for playing Janet Keogh (née Smith) in the BBC sitcom Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps. In Two Pints, Janet is the girlfriend and eventual wife of Jonny Keogh, played by Ralf Little." for the image to pass the criteria. Other, better articles have been dragged backwards kicking and screaming through a bed of thorns over the use of non-free images despite meeting all of the criteria. There is therefore no reason why Image:Sheridan Smith.jpg should appear in such a small undeveloped article. Besides, the image does not show her "playing" her most well-known character; it shows Smith in costume looking at the camera. When inserting non-free images like that into an article, screenshots are best because they actually show the actor playing the character. Brad (talk) 10:31, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Mary Tanner
Fine maybe this article is not a hoax but I still see no evidence that she is 'Dame Commander of the British Empire'. Could you please provide a source for this, thank you. Harland1 (t/c) 19:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Prižba
Hello, Paste. I've seen your changes on the article Prižba.
That village is located on the southern coast, and it follows the coastline, it goes along it. Do you get it?
Second change: article is about that village, not about that island, so we're speaking about main economic activity of the village.
Thanks for help on the article. Kamarad Walter (talk) 13:15, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Do you find geographical description confusing? I'll fix it, just say it. Bye, Kamarad Walter (talk) 17:53, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding Thomas Oldham Barlow
You have a heading at the top of the page which says to "assume good faith." You might take your own advice. Believe it or not, I've been known to make mistakes. It's not assuming good faith, however, if you come to my talk page and say it's "unbelievable" that anyone could take such an action. Next time you want to dispute someone's action, you might want to try a more polite method to letting them know they made a mistake. -- Redfarmer (talk) 19:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Church Of Holy Trinity Cuckfield
I agree with your speedy deletion tag. Thanks for noting it on my talk page. Monkeytheboy (talk) 18:14, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sorry for the confusion
Hello Paste. Sorry for the confusion. I had an aunt who lived In Horsham for over 70 years. Have visited the town many, many times. Apologies, Bashereyre (talk) 22:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC) Sorry, we weren't able to suggest any articles for you. Something is probably wrong on our end.
[edit] Independent Schools Barbarians
You've completed the request for deletion review correctly. I have moved the review to the top of the page Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 January 15 though, since the reviews are listed in reverse chronological order. I've also corrected a typo in the article name. AecisBrievenbus 22:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:17, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Castro
Yes, I submitted a vandal report for that user. They were already indef blocked under another user name for creating the bogus Castro article under a slightly different title. Hopefully an admin will take care of it soon.--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 09:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Jimmy harding
User talk:Cub55 has made another JH page. I placed another tag on it. Just thought you'd like to know. Basketballoneten 00:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- It was obviously deleted. If the link pops up again, it probably means he, or she has added another liking of Harding's to the page. Basketballoneten 00:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Your email to me regarding the Norfolk Punt
Hello,
You say "Norfolk Punt - I've Wikified the article for you but it will get deleted soon if you don't amend it as I see that it's a copyright infringement of the website that you reference". How can it be copyright infringement if I am the original author and poster of the article on the Norfolk Punt website?!
Nick —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sailnick (talk • contribs) 21:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Hassocks Golf Club
I have nominated Hassocks Golf Club, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hassocks Golf Club. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gary King (talk) 22:16, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] You're Good
Ok, you did manage to obliterate my hoax, which I admit was a hoax and deserved deleting. I'm not bitter at all, I just wanted to know how in the world you found it so fast! Haha. Please quench my curiosity.
Desensitize (talk) 01:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Desensitize
[edit] Speedy deletion of Griffin Inn
A tag has been placed on Griffin Inn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 18:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Re your message on my talk page, an admin has declined speedy deletion so the article stays. As regards moving the article, as I understand WP guideline, definite and indefinite article are noy used in the names of articles. – ukexpat (talk) 20:42, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] hey
are you an administrator? I noticed you modified some of my newly created articles so if there are any problems let me know! My first time using wikipedia. . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddfffggg2008 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Dorothy Stringer Vandalism
Hi, I'm largely responsible for having written the majority of the article for Dorothy Stringer, and you're large responsible for having removed the endless vandalsim.
Since all the vandalsim over the last few weeks has come from new or unregistered Wiki editors, do you support (i) a move to semi-protect the page or (ii) are you happy to continue to remove the edits?
Yours,
Var42606 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Var42605 (talk • contribs) 12:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Charles Allen Prosser
Paste: Thanks for wikifying my article, sorry for reverting your changes.Cool10191 (talk) 19:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Llanidloes High School
Perhaps you could reconsider your speedy delete on the above now that I have expanded the article. It's notable by virtue of its past pupil and indeed as a comprehensive in its own right. Thanks. Paste (talk) 18:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- At time of being tagged, the page consisted of no more that 2 lines of poor grammar describing the school. Thank you for expanding the article. — Johnl1479(talk) 20:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ship's image
Thank you, Paste, for fixing the ship's image at Silver Line (shipping company) JohnClarknew (talk) 21:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Uh uh, now somebody else has weighed in with a revert back to a thumbnail. I'm undoing it right now, and explained why on the discussion page. Their reasoning is factually inaccurate too. JohnClarknew (talk) 01:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Bailey Willis
Hey, when someone puts up the {{underconstruction}} tag, it means they're working on it actively. Editing while it's up will created edit conflicts, and is considered discourteous. I'm sure you didn't realize it, as you only made two edits at the time. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:24, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- S'okay, no offense; only frustration. Since your edits were valid, I tried to reincorporate them. Here, have a cookie! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:31, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- CobaltBlueTony™ talk has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
- Look it over closely: I've added correct links, and included your edits. If you see something wrong, please tell me. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- I've added the WKU reference as an inline citation. References that aren't inline are classed as external links, so that the references section can be uniform. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- P.S. I said "I think I'm done." I was wrong. ;-) - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:57, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wymondham College
Thanks for your help at Wymondham College. There seem to be some children repeatedly trying to add nonsense to it. It seem to be the guy featured here: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Chimpywiki Sally Anne (talk) 20:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] proposal to merge WP:PROF into WP:BIO
There is an ongoing discussion of a proposal to merge WP:PROF into WP:BIO at Wikipedia talk: Notability (academics). Since you have commented in AfD discussions for articles about academics, you may want to participate in the discussion of this merge proposal. Regards, Nsk92 (talk) 12:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Cars
Please add British cars to the AFD --Dweller (talk) 14:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Bomere Pool
Many thanks for your help and assistance, much appreciated. This was the first Wiki entry that I have sourced, rather than amending and editing an existing article. It is small, probably will not get much bigger, but I am quite pleased with it. There were references all over the place to the mere and I felt it was about time it had a page for itself 21stCenturyGreenstuff (talk) 22:11, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Peter Maddocks
No problem. Good to see it's no longer a copy-paste of the man's bio page. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:34, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Learning to Learn (lesson)
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Learning to Learn (lesson), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Mergers do not require an AfD
That is all that TerriersFan meant. You need not seek any consensus to merge an article, you can just do it or apply a merge tag {{merge}} or {{merge-school}}, for instance. See Alternatives to deletion for more info. Cheers! DoubleBlue (Talk) 18:53, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Renault Cars
Hello Paste, I thank a lot for your correction in the artikles about the cars from Renault. Thanks --Crazy1880 (talk) 06:17, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Marci Lipman
Hi. I noticed you didn't drop the article creator a note to warn them that you'd speedy tagged the article. It's quite an important courtesy. I hope you won't mind if I suggest you install WP:TWINKLE which will do the job for you. --Dweller (talk) 20:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- I think I've worked it out and I think it's my error, so sorry for bothering you! --Dweller (talk) 23:16, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Peter O'Sullivan (racing commentator)
Hi. I'm going to propose that the new article you created yesterday be merged into the existing article, Peter O'Sullevan, which is the correct spelling of his name. Thanks anyway, there are only a small number of contributors covering UK horse racing, and anything is welcome on the subject - I see you also started one on Richard Pitman, which is good. --Bcp67 (talk) 08:40, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] What?
What you are saying? I did not understand. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:46, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for The Help
Thanks for the help on The Secret History of the IRA page. WH.--WilliamHanrahan (talk) 18:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Chronology of Human Prehistory
Thank you for your positive and useful contribution to this page. Bless you. Das Baz, aka Erudil 16:00, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- With respect, I'm not happy with them. A couple are well out of date and not from people with the relevant expertise anyway, and this is a field where new discoveries are made if not every day certainly several times a year. One was a foreign language book taken from another article, and neither of us knows if it was correct I think. The Toba volcano entry is basically speculation on a very contentious topic, and I'm not convinced a list is a good place for contentious topics. I'm still not convinced about this article, and certainly not about anyone creating lists like this with no references.Doug Weller (talk) 14:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- With respect you are onto the wrong author, my contribution to this article is limited to correcting a spelling mistake and showing by an internal link that the article in terms of the volcanic eruption is purely a theory.Paste (talk) 15:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oops, many, many apologies. I should have been more careful.Doug Weller (talk) 16:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- With respect you are onto the wrong author, my contribution to this article is limited to correcting a spelling mistake and showing by an internal link that the article in terms of the volcanic eruption is purely a theory.Paste (talk) 15:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Christopher Tsai
Thanks for the message -- he has ignored a final warning so I have filed an AIV report over at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism.
[edit] Help! A Secret History of the IRA
Dear Paste, your help here (if you're willing) will be welcome. The article A Secret History of the IRA was created yesterday. You helped create a better link for the reference to reviews of the book, which was written by Ed Moloney. An editor, One Night In Hackney, will not leave the article alone. In his latest entry he attacks a source, The Blanket, an on-line journal. This reflects his POV. I have tried to keep in the article the important information that author Moloney employs primary sources in The Secret History of the IRA. One Night in Hackney keeps deleting this. As he knows Wikipedia better than I, and evidently has anything I edit marked, he's undermining ANYTHING I do. I've appealed to WP:ANI, but am new at such things and may not have done it correctly. Thank you.--WilliamHanrahan (talk) 01:13, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] "Everex green computers" fixed up
You caught me in the middle of working on the Everex green computers article. I have a bit more content on there now: please feel free to revisit it. Cwolfsheep (talk) 21:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Where to post?
I'm new to Wikipedia, and as such I'm not sure where to post my disagreement with combining the Spencerport Swim Team page with the page for Spencerport High School. I had clicked on the "discuss" button and assumed that was where I was supposed to post. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnellist (talk • contribs) 19:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Marie Slater
I fail to see your reasoning in nominating the Marie Slater article for deletion. With time and a little contribution i feel this article would certainly become worthy, if it is not already. As for 'fleeting TV appearances' she had a very prominent role in Club Reps and became an overnight Media star following the shows success. She has also presented other shows on Sky Television. Which i wouldn't call a 'fleeting appearance' especially as she is still interviewed by the press to this day. As for an article on Stephen Haddrill i find this rather pointless and uninteresting. Quite why you feel HE is worthy of an article is beyond me! What has he done besides being the managing director of a company? Should we now list EVERY SINGLE managing director of a company?! Maybe your article should be next in line for deletion...
[edit] Tavistock and Summerhill School
It still looks like a prospectus, with nothing about the site, buildings or history.--Charles (talk) 20:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikiCookie
[edit] Oldland Mill
Well, the article stated that the mill was in Ditchling (also refering to it as "Ditchling Mill") and didn't mention Keymar at all, so the article title didn't make any sense. Perhaps this information was incorrect? Keymer and Ditchling are in different counties, so the windmill's location needs to be correct. Small-town hero (talk) 21:38, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Bernard Mitton
I have no relation to the player, I have simply incorporated the information on his ATP Tour profile. He is currently the most prominent player on the Tour to lack an appropriate article, and I am filling in holes. Thank you for your diligence, but sources are now on the article. Benkenobi18 (talk) 21:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
