Talk:Pasalubong

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of Tambayan Philippines, the WikiProject and notice board for topics related to the Philippines. To participate, visit the Tambayan for more information.
Stub	This article has been rated* as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.*
Low	This article has been rated* as Low-importance on the importance scale.*

[edit] Dicdef

This strikes me as a mere dictionary definition, and a foreign dictionary to boot. Ought it have its own article? Avalon 20:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result was no merge.

I vote Don't merge-This is a cultural concept and therefore must be expanded. I think this should be recategorized.23prootie 00:51, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

~~"Merge"~~ - although an important cultural concept, there is a lack of references needed to expand the article. Searching pasalubong on the net would usually bring you to online stores that sells products that target Filipinos. --Lenticel 23:02, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

changed vote to "don't merge" as the article has independent RS and has expanded significantly.--Lenticel ^(talk) 11:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

DON'T MERGE, this is the only word that can possibly represent this cultural practice and all its attendant meanings for Filipinos all over the world. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mvjdejesus (talk • contribs) 05:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I believe it should NOT BE MERGED. This is not too broad nor too vague to be merged with with Culture of the Philippines. This has to stand on its own as Part of Pinoys, though adamant for Filipinos and in technical concept, part of the Culture, it should stand on its own. User:Axxand talk 05:39, 19 April 2007 UHT

Don't Merge BUT shift focus from the concrete manifestation (the keepsake itself) towards the cultural concept - which in the end is a manifestation of pakikipagkapwa... er... that means a rather drastic rewrite, though, I'm afraid.Alternativity (talk) 17:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm boldly closing this as don't merge.--Lenticel ^(talk) 11:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.