User talk:Party
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Party (talk • contribs • block logauto) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template. If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here. |
 |
This user is a sock puppet of EpicFlame, and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful. Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs |
 Archives |
Contents |
RE: Barnstar
Say, thanks! It has been added to my shelf of shiny things. :) GlassCobra 05:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks from me too, much appreciated :-) All the best! CounterFX (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for the barnstar Party. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 11:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks as well. It's only my 3rd barnstar. Stifle (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
AWB for user:wolfram1
see User_talk:Wolfram1#WP:AWB --Wolfram1 (talk) 18:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Re: WP:AWB
Thanks for looking over my application. Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 21:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Re:AWB question
It can be used on any wiki. jj137 (talk) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- My immediate reaction was that since he has less than 500 edits here he should be declined, but I later went back and approved him because he has well over 1000 on de:. The English wikipedia is the only place you can be approved for AWB, so sometimes users from other languages (with over 500 edits there) will request approval here, and they should be approved. jj137 (talk) 04:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
You're welcome
It's my pleasure. And thank you so much for the barnstar! Have a great weekend, JNW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
No problem. - Rjd0060 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Ditto per above--Antonio Lopez (talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
Per CheckUser evidence, I've blocked this account as a sock puppet of EpicFlame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log). Ryan Postlethwaite 00:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Notes from Deskana
The Arbitration Committee received a request for unblock from this user via e-mail. On my discussion with this user, the following was noted;
- He openly admit to flooding #wikipedia-en to me on IRC. He said "i used to botnet #wikipedia for giggles", then "now i rarely do it", rarely being the operative word there. He was not even remotely apologetic.
- When I said I was declining his unblock, he said "I'm involving a crat anyway". I told him that not only am I a bureaucrat, but that they had nothing to do with unblocks. He then said he wanted to ask the community for an unblock. I told him you can't ask ArbCom, get it declined, then ask someone else until you get the answer you want.
- When I again told him I was declining his unblock, he started insulting me. He said he'd appeal to Jimbo (also calling Jimbo a name in the process). He then offered me $2000 to unblock him. I'm pretty sure that wasn't serious.
Given the above, it is the recommendation of the Committee that the community be aware this user has indicated they will seek to forum shop, and that unblocking should be done only upon communal consensus that the block no longer serves to protect the project.
For the Arbitration Committee,
