User talk:Particle/Archive Apr 2007

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:

If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~

snoyes 19:15, 4 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Test particle 06:08, Feb 5, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] The Guide To Selling Your Music In The iTunes Music Store

A tag has been placed on The Guide To Selling Your Music In The iTunes Music Store, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 06:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


This is spam. Intentional or not (and I suspect it is intentional), it is blatant advertising, or "spam." Whether or not it is a real book is irrelevant; in fact, if it were not real, it would be listed instead as a hoax, not spam. A "sensible outline" likely won't make any difference. The Amazon sales rank is around 286,000, which doesn't help it with notability issues, either. If it reads like an advertisement, it is an advertisement, and qualifies for deletion. Realkyhick 07:00, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Like I said, whether or not it is a real book is irrelevant. Not all real books belong at Wikipedia, only those that meet notability standards. And even for those that do, articles about them that are written like an advertisement (such as this one) are still not acceptable. There doesn't have to be a "buy button" to qualify as spam; this is a straw man argument that you have set up which has no merit whatsoever. It is also telling that you created the article about the author, Simon Higgs, and created a category (which will also likely be deleted, since it only has one possible listing) for Higgs' books. This has all the tell-tale signs of an article written solely to promote a book, and Wikipedia is not the place for that. Realkyhick 07:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article The Guide To Selling Your Music In The iTunes Music Store, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Accounts used solely for blatant self-promotion may be blocked indefinitely without further warning.

For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Thank you. Dynaflow 08:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. --Dynaflow 09:29, 21 April 2007 (UTC)