User talk:Paris1745

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Speedy deletion of Cdncc.com

A tag has been placed on Cdncc.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Shawnpoo 20:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello. In order for the article to be kept, you need to provide independent third party sources (such as newspaper or trade journal articles) about the company, otherwise it will fail WP:NOTABILITY. Do not focus on any "qualities" (or it will be deleted again per {{db-spam}}), but just write about what the site does. пﮟოьεԻ 57 08:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi Paris. Although the new version is better, I am still concerned about its notability. If it really was popular like the British Exchange & Mart website, I'm sure it would get more than 156 google hits - very very poor a well-established company (E&M gets 711,000). What concerns me even more is that the language you use ("Cdncc.com is distinguided from every other classifieds website by providing a parallel Usenet gateway") is almost identical to the wording of several recent press releases. I would still probably delete the article if I saw it, sorry, пﮟოьεԻ 57 08:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)