Talk:PartiallyClips

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related work groups (general): Webcomics work group

[edit] Tycho is wrong

From 21 Dec detail Is this who I think it is?

 "2005-12-21       19:32:12 UTC    Robert Balder   USD     20.00   -0.74   19.26   Because Tycho is wrong about Wikipedia!"

Not main article worthy but worth noting!

++Lar 15:25, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Notability claims

The article makes several separate claims as to the notability of the subject without changes. The fact that this comic strip currently runs in newspapers in major metropolitan markets alone is enough to denote its notability for inclusion. Its inclusion in the Attitude 3 print collection, and the fact that is is by the creator of Erfworld, another notable comic would each be acceptable criteria. It is agreed that the article could be fleshed out to include references to the work in print interviews (these do exist) and other additional sources. However, to say that the article makes no claims to notability of the subject is incorrect. Please remove this tag.

Agreed. Publication in major print newspapers alone should be sufficient to be notable. A list of print publications that currently or have previously featured this comic can be found on the website's front page: http://partiallyclips.com/. This tag needs removing, and even a modicum of research would have shown that it should never have be added in the first place. 76.22.111.251 22:22, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

I third this. I mean, five years of comics in and of themselves is a big deal for a webcomic, and this one actually made the jump to newspapers.

Seeing no further argument in the other direction, and noting direct references to three print publications and indirect references to around 25, it appears to me that the article has sufficiently established notability. I'm removing the tag. DarthParadox 20:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] King and Jester image

The King and Jester comic was inappropriately speedy-deleted. The policy cited refers to non-free content; however, the comic in question has been released by its author.

The comic has had its notification updated to reflect a complete release into public domain. I've reuploaded it into Wikimedia Commons with the new notification, and relinked it in the article. DarthParadox 23:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)