Talk:Parliament House, Melbourne

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Portal	Parliament House, Melbourne is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Parliament House, Melbourne article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

[edit] Do we need another image?

I have another image (taken by me) of this building. It's not pretty, but maybe with a bit of photoshopping...:) Anyway, just in case, it's here. Stevage 14:34, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Cut out the car and the street and it is probably better than the one there now. Xtra 14:36, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

I've cut out as much of the car and road as possible and uploaded the image as Image:Melbourne Parliament House edit.JPG. (In retrospect, I probably should have uploaded it as a replacement of this picture.) I'll try it out in the article and see how it fits. Blarneytherinosaur talk 06:08, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't see that it's better than the original one (I am of coursed biased since I took the first one). In any case it shows exactly the same aspect of the building. Adam 06:23, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

You're right about the aspect, plus the new picture shows the tram wires. I'll put the original back at the top and start a small gallery at the bottom. Blarneytherinosaur talk 06:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)