Partition (politics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In politics, a partition is a change of political borders cutting through at least one community’s homeland. That change is done primarily via diplomatic means, and use of military force is negligible.[citation needed]

Common arguments for partitions include:

  • historicist - that partition is inevitable, or is already happening, this argument is related to historicism
  • last resort - that partition should be pursued to avoid the worst outcomes (genocide or largescale ethnic expulsions), if other means fail
  • cost-benefit - that partition offers, on balance, a better prospect of conflict reduction than the maintenance of the existing borders
  • better tomorrow - that there will be a reduction in actual violence and conflict recurrence, and that the new more homogenized polities that emerge will have better prospects for the peaceful development in future
  • rigorous end - heterogeneity in cultures is bad, homogeneous states should be the goal of any policy[citation needed]

[edit] Examples

Notable examples (see also Category:Partition) are:

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ Norman Davies: God's Playground [1]
  2. ^ Stephen R. Turnbull, Tannenberg 1410: Disaster for the Teutonic Knights [2]
  3. ^ Elements of General History: Ancient and Modern, by Millot (Claude François Xavier) [3]
  4. ^ Arthur Hassall, The Balance of Power. 1715 - 1789 [4]
  5. ^ Norman Davies: God's Playground [5]
  6. ^ The Polish Occupation. Czechoslovakia was, of course, mutilated not only by Germany. Poland and Hungary also each asked for their share - Hubert Ripka: Munich, Before and After: A Fully Documented Czechoslovak Account of the ..., 1939 [6]
  7. ^ Samuel Leonard Sharp: Poland, White Eagle on a Red Field, [7]
  8. ^ Norman Davies: God's Playground [8]
  9. ^ Debates of the Senate of the Dominion of Canada [9]
Languages