Talk:Panic of 1893
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the United States WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to United States-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. |
| Start | rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale |
| High | rated as High-importance on the assessment scale |
Template:WikiProject butt
For goodness sake, the bibliography takes up more space than the actual article content. That's got to be some kind of record. --JW1805 (Talk) 02:10, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
- It really is absurd and very unbecoming of the article. Could the frequent contributors narrow it down to just a handful? Or better yet, add citations to the article and only include cited works at the bottom? Boubelium 08:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
No harm in having a large bibliography, mate. I mean wheres the harm in it, hmm?-3/12/07
-
- Scholarship is in fact based on sources. There's an advantage for users who can use the bibliography to do write papers on the topic. Many of the items are online and accessible at colleges. Rjensen 01:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Although many speculators believed that the famous railroad-tycoon Jay Gould had played a major part in the Panic of 1893, in reality, he was simply another victim of the times. Now that just ain'ta POV sentence blokey, it just aen't!-3/13/07
