Talk:Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila ROTC Unit
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Maragtas.JPG
Image:Maragtas.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RELEVANCE OF PLM E-GROUP AS AN EXTERNAL LINK
Hi User, here's a response and explanation on why should the PLM e-group be posted in the external links. (in the 1st place there are no rules in wikipedia prohibiting e-groups as an external link, so pls. don't invent one. and there are no other e-groups posting in the external link of magwayen, ap, and PLM rotc - those are not PLM page so pls. don't be an OA ok, worrying that other e-groups will be posting theirs, it's just your own bias perception)
PLS. READ THIS with an OPEN-MIND and UNDERSTANDING ISKO: Thank You
PLM Scholars Comment:
Hey...(fabyan17)
I believe that you are a die-hard PLM alumnus. But please stop posting your Yahoo group as one of the external links for PLM articles because it is SIMPLY IRRELEVANT. And, also please cease from insisting that your PLM E-group article here at Wikipedia be revived because it is VERY INSIGNIFICANT and SO UNENCYCLOPEDIC.
MY RESPONSE to User: PLM Scholar:
How can the PLM e-group be insignificant, when in fact it was officiated and administered by then Dean of Mass Communication, Dr. Barrios. This was authorized by the admin. in 2005, in order to connect and find all PLMayers around the globe because they will be celebrating the PLM Ruby Anniv. back then, and they want to inform all iskos for the said Homecoming. Do you know the meaning of- IRRELEVANT? your actions are the IRRELEVANT ones. just for your info kapatid, PLM E-group is the most active PLM internet forum today; it has members from the pioneer PLM batch of 1960's up to the present batch, half of the members are alumni, the rest are students and faculty. Have you visited or joined the PLM e-group? haven't you seen the NEWS & ANNOUNCMENTS about PLM in that forum? haven't you read the SIGNIFICANT inquiries of the students/alumni which is being answered in that forum?
Lack of Knowledge Destroys people and it is very dangerous. You should have atleast investigated or have a background check of the PLM E-group to know if it is IRRELEVANT or not important. Have you read the rationale/rules of wikipedia? do they consider e-groups as irrelevant EXTERNAL link, (not internal)? You are making your own rules, based on bias emotions. You don't even check the other external links if they are legitimate or related to PLM, a lot of the links are dead/non-existent. You should have removed or updated those links but then you only focus your bias perception to the PLM E-group which is undeniably a RELEVANT PLM "EXTERNAL" link. (It is a LINK and not an ARTICLE)
You can even find the PLM E-group link in the AP Official website (PLM websites link):
http://www.angpamantasan.org/common_files/plm_sites.htm
If AP (together with thousands of PLMayers in the PLM E-group) considers it RELEVANT, who are you to classify it as IRRELEVANT?
It is even listed in the BESTDISCUSSIONGROUPS.COM (a listing of relevant, best and most active e-groups in the world:
http://www.bestdiscussiongroups.com/cat2464/5.htm
(Since you've put the level of this discussion in a "personal" one, here's a personal comment to you) PLM Scholar, you even use the username PLM scholar, when you don't even scholarly investigated if the PLM E-group is relevant or not. That is the real funny action. But I won't laugh bec. You are my kapwa isko and I care for that matter. FTSantos ©Bot 13:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Fabian T. Santos ===PLM E-group Head Moderator===FTSantos ©Bot 10:55, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
