From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Archaeology Portal This article is part of WikiProject Archaeology, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

	This article is supported by WikiProject Anthropology. This project provides a central approach to Anthropology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.

	Paleoethnobotany is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to plants and botany. For more information, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Okay, how do you do internal links that have a slightly different name? I tried the vertical line and it did not work. I would like to add links to Coprolites, domestication and other terms. Plus, I have a lot of content in my head that should be added. I will look up current research so that it is not outdated and cite it. Anyway, I hope someone reads this. This is a very exciting subject for me and I could go on and on with it.

• If You are still having problems, put the word You want to link from and the one You want to link to here on the discussion page, and I'll try to put the links into the page.

Kdammers 01:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] =

Direction. I need help with organization. I have it all in my brain and what I do not have, I can find references but it is too much. I think this might be a problem with wiki or open source and free thinking in general. I could write a text book on this subject but I to not think this is appropriate for an encyclopedia. I need direction. Any help would be appreciated.

Julie62 05:43, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)