User talk:Pakhtun Tanoli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Pakhtun Tanoli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  AnupamTalk 20:48, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Links for Wikipedians interested in India content

Register: Indian Wikipedians | Network: Noticeboard | Discussionboard Browse: India | Open tasks | Deletions
Contribute content: Collaboration Dashboard - India WikiProject - Wikiportal India - Indian current events - Category adoptions



Contents

[edit] Tanoli

You have made very abusive and unsubstantiated edits to the Tanoli page. This is known as Vandalism and will not be tolerated on wikipedia. Should you behaviour continue, you will be voted for a ban.

You are requested to wikify your additions and provide sources for your contribution in Tanoli page.
Siddiqui 15:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

You are being warned to clean up your language and provide sources for your claims that Tanolis are an accepted pashtun tribe, as there is NO source that backs this up. You are engaging in a revert war and are also being warned for incivility. Behave and provide sources or otherwise engage with me on the topic in a civil tone or you will be blocked.--Raja 19:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Response from Pakhtun Tanoli

I have provided several references for the Pakhtun origin of Tanolis. You have to see the several works of Tanoli and non-Tanoli historians in the text and the references list at the end of the article. As a social analyst trained in the historical and anthropological analysis and over thirty years of research in this area, along with being a university based academic I feel I have an objective role in this debate. Secondly, I am a son of Malik of one of the septs of Tanolis which has direct role in this debate i.e. that I have access to family and regional sources to bring to the issues directly related to the topic. You username of Raja tells me that you are neither of Pakhtun, Tanoli or of Hazara/NWPF origin. Moreover, the sources you quote have been consulted by me and there is no mention of Janjuas in those pages of the texts you quote. Finally, your patronising language is abusive to say the least. Incidently I am in the process of publishing my findings which challenge the Afghanisation theory you are so fond of mentioning - the text is in the process of being refereed by relevant authorities.

When incivility and plain bad behaviour occurs, one is encouraged to challenge it here in wiki. You may publish an article without a doubt, but your theories must be substantiated with credible source and evidence, which thus far you have alluded and not provided. Infact you have rubbished most credible evidence anyway, which is strange and unacademic as you fondly allege to be. Let us continue the debate at the Janjua or the Tanoli page, your choice. By the way, the name Raja is actually a title, so please clarify your facts. To further dispute your erroneous claim, Raja Shahwali Khan of the early 19th century, the celebrated Gakhar of Hazara region is no doubt also a further proof that Rajas have ruled into the NWFP region too without relent.Infact his current descendant is Sultan Erij Zaman Khan! --Raja 20:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Block

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. The block is for one week. Please reform your behavior. --Nlu (talk) 18:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)