User talk:Painjoiker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Hey

I have a serious question. Was the Master Passion Greed article a hoax? MSG ME at: -Xaremathras (talk) 03:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Xaremathras

[edit] Warning(s) against Artifact (band)

I've nominated the article Artifact (Stavanger) for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Artifact (Stavanger) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artifact (Stavanger). Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Artifact (Stavanger) during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:50, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Artifact (Band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DarkSaber2k 11:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself, as you did with Artifact (Band). Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. DarkSaber2k 11:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Artifact (Band). If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DarkSaber2k 11:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Abandoned E.P., you will be blocked from editing. DarkSaber2k 11:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning(s) against removing AFD tags

Please do not remove AFD tags from articles. —Wknight94 (talk) 16:14, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning(s) against vandalism to user pages

Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent, as you did with User:Mdd4696. It may be seen as vandalism. ... discospinster talk 20:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

It is vandalism, and completely inappropriate. I'm not entirely sure what prompted your outburst, but if it happens again your account will be blocked. ~MDD4696 21:58, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warning(s) against removing vandalism warnings

Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. —Wknight94 (talk) 10:57, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. Removing legitimate warnings from your talk page is considered disruption. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:22, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove legitimate vandalism warnings from your talkpage. You are welcome to archive your talk page, but not blank out warnings all together. These warnings serve multiple purposes, not only do they make you aware that your edits have been identified as unconstructive, but they also serve as a record for administrators to deal with users who continue to make unconstructive edits. Please make sure to heed thess warnings too, continuing to ignore them and blanking them will result in you getting blocked. --Leon Sword 03:56, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning(s) against creating inappropiate pages

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page The Waffelrøre. Your test worked, and has been or will soon be removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please see WP:MUSIC. NawlinWiki 19:30, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bjweeks (talk • contribs) 11:34, 9 October 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Warning(s) against blanking or removing content in articles

This is your only warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Mate.Feed.Kill.Repeat, you will be blocked from editing. -- Shatterzer0 23:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning(s) against vandalism to articles

Stop vandalising the review scores on Nightwish albums. SouperAwesome 07:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Children of Bodom. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Leon Sword 00:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Over the Hills and Far Away.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Over the Hills and Far Away.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:21, 23 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. HermesBot 19:21, 23 August 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Angels Fall First (Re-recorded).JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Angels Fall First (Re-recorded).JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:36, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Angels Fall First (re-recorded)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Angels Fall First (re-recorded), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Chaser - T 00:48, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Bye Bye Beautiful 1.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bye Bye Beautiful 1.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Nightwish-Demo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nightwish-Demo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:10, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Dimmu Borgir - Rehearsal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dimmu Borgir - Rehearsal.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:07, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Artifact (Band)

A tag has been placed on [[:Ar

[edit] Nightwish

Nightwish has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Thank you,
Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 04:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] James Bond film series

Thank you for experimenting with the page James Bond film series on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (jarbarf) (talk) 20:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Master Passion Greed.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Master Passion Greed.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy Delete of The New Rammstien Album due to Advertising

A tag has been placed on New Rammstien Album, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dustihowe  Talk  18:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of New Rammstein Album

An editor has nominated New Rammstein Album, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Rammstein Album and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of New Rammstein Album

A tag has been placed on New Rammstein Album, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ≈ The Haunted Angel 19:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Master Passion Greed

An editor has nominated Master Passion Greed, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master Passion Greed and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Crematory (demo)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Crematory (demo), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Warning against removing AFD tags

Please do not remove articles for deletion tags from articles as you did to Master Passion Greed. Rehevkor (talk) 14:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Temptation (Emigrate song)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Temptation (Emigrate song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Temptation (Emigrate song). - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 22:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Master Passion Greed.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Master Passion Greed.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Master Passion Greed

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Master Passion Greed, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Rehevkor (talk) 17:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Master Passion Greed EP

If you have further information regarding this single, you are welcome to bring the deletion debate and your new information to deletion review, which may result in the space being unprotected so that the article can be written. Otherwise, please do not continue to repost the article under variant names. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Master Passion Greed EP. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Victao lopes (talk) 21:41, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Besides tagging "hangon", you should also explain why you believe your article shouldn't be deleted on its talk page. If you don't do so, your article is likely to de speedy deleted, just the same. Remember to provide references for your article. Victao lopes (talk) 23:05, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] You/Play with Me

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article You/Play with Me, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of You/Play with Me. Redfarmer (talk) 18:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Emigrate - Temptation.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Emigrate - Temptation.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Abandoned EP.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Abandoned EP.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:The Only Salvation.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The Only Salvation.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Deathfare (band)

A tag has been placed on Deathfare (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 17:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Unpure (band)

A tag has been placed on Unpure (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 17:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Unpure (band), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 17:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Deathfare (band)‎, you will be blocked from editing. Carlosguitar (ready and willing) 18:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] NWOBHM is a Music genre

If you agree, please see the page : Category:Wikipedians who believe NWOBHM is a music genre . Master Redyva ♠ 22:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:New Messiah.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:New Messiah.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rammstein (album)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rammstein (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mdsummermsw (talk) 20:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Rammstein (album)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Rammstein (album), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rammstein (album). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jeff Killed John (JKJ Album)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jeff Killed John (JKJ Album), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Jeff Killed Jon. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:07, 2 May 2008 (UTC)