User talk:Packa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Moto Guzzi

OK, I moved the notable owners into the popular culture section. I also moved the People section to "Key Moto Guzzi People" and placed it under "History" as a subsection. Could also be "Key Moto Guzzi personnel". What do you think? --Cheesy Mike 16:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Second chance?

Hi there, as you are probably away a recent checkuser was preformed to reveal that you have been using various accounts as sockpuppets. If we can come to a agreement that you will no longer use sockpuppets, I would be willing to unblock this account. If you are interested let me know (here of course) and we can discuss some unblocking terms. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 01:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)


Yes?

Packa (talk) 01:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Great! I am glad to hear that you are interested in working to better your habits here at en.wikipedia as I noticed that you have a lot of good contributions. First off I would only unblock this account and would not allow you to use the other accounts you have abused, second off you may not create any more accounts, and third you may not try and sway consensus through any other means than what is common practice and is outlined in WP:CONSENSUS. Doing any of the fallowing will result in a immediate re-blocking without warning. Are you willing to fallow these guidelines? Tiptoety talk 14:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I would prefer not to use this account if possible. The 842U account is the one I would prefer to use if possible. But either way, I would be willing to follow these guidelines. Packa (talk) 14:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Okay, is that your "main account"? Cause after looking over the contribs from this account I thought this one was. Tiptoety talk 14:27, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
842U is the account I've used primarily. But this could have been the earlier account.
Also, would you be willing to look at something for me? In the events leading up to where we are today, I had been involved in clear edit war with IFCAR in the Subaru Forester article. To the best of my knowledge, at the time of my initial edit in the article, there was no convention or guideline regarding lead image photos.
Discussion that followed this edit war are in these locations.
WikiProject Auto's Lead Infobox Photos
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles/Conventions
Cabal Case.
At one point, IFCAR appealed here [1] to ask Scheinwerfermann to help him avoid 3RR and EW... which Scheinwerfermann appears then to have complied with the request. Would you please look at their behavior in this instance?


Also, Scheinwerfermann took the liberty of crossing through all my posts on a discussion page here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles, adding insult to injury, and I'm wondering if you'd request that be undone.
Thanks. Packa (talk) 14:49, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Okay, I will unblock the 842 linking the unblock message here (please do not remove this discussion from this talk page). Understand that the same unblock rules apply to that account.
Now as for the whole issue with lead photo's and what not, I am not sure what I can do by myself and work recommend that once you are unblocked start a thread at WP:ANI stating what IFCAR and Scheinwerfermann have done (as striking out your comments is not allowed). Until a community consensus decides what to do with the whole situation and until their has been a consensus on the talk page of the wikiproject there is not much I can do. Cheers, Tiptoety talk 16:14, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
I did a little more research and found this page where it appears that a discussion has begun. Try there before you head to WP:ANI. (I have unblocked your 842U). Tiptoety talk 16:48, 23 May 2008 (UTC)