Talk:Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Influential papers

We may need a set of criteria if we are to start the trend of listing publications like this. Better way would be to substitute 'influential' with 'noteworthy', and then actually assert, in prose, the noteworthiness (i.e. publication X was only possible through the PSB community and resulted in the founding of a new area of scientfic investigation that has ... etc). Without a criteria for 'influential', or a statement of noteworthiness, we will end up listing all the publications that came out of the PSB, in order to be NPOV! Jethero^Talk 00:52, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Registration typically fills up early

I removed that line. Sounds like advertising, and it was unreferenced. Early compared to what? Why is that important to an encyclopedia article? Perhaps a referenced comment about the level of competition? (what's the manuscript acceptance rate for this conference? What about the allumni return rate? how would that compare to related conferences?) Jethero^Talk 00:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)