Talk:Pacific Sunwear

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The page I wrote was about a store in the mall. Could someone please place it in its correct section? I would gladly appreciate it.

No, I am putting up a VFD since I feel this subject does not deserve an article, nor a merger. The writing is substandard, the article is vain and it contains no useful information. Nova Cygni 14:20, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Contents 1 Copyright 2 Vote for Deletion 3 Dead link 4 dead link?

[edit] Copyright

Significant portions of this article appear to be taken word for word from a Business Week article found at [1]. The article should be rewritten to remove that content. --Metropolitan90 July 7, 2005 15:17 (UTC)

[edit] Vote for Deletion

This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. I have removed the copyright violating portion of the article. -Splash 03:01, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://online.wsj.com/tafkam/public-quote?route=BOH&template=company-research&ambiguous-purchase-template=company-research-symbol-ambiguity&profile-name=Portfolio1&profile-version=3.0&profile-type=Portfolio&profile-format-action=include&public=yes&profile-read-action=skip-read&profile-write-action=skip-write&p-headline=wsjie&transform-value-quote-search=PSUN&transform-name-quote-search=nvp-set-p-sym&nvp-companion-p-type=usstock+usfund&q-match=stem&q-šmax_results=200&p-sym=&p-name=&section=quote&profile-end=Portfolio&p-headline=wsjie
  • In Pacific Sunwear on Mon Jul 17 14:53:08 2006, Non-ASCII Characters in URL: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\u0161' in position 438: ordinal not in range(128)
  • In Pacific Sunwear on Thu Jul 27 00:37:11 2006, Non-ASCII Characters in URL: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\u0161' in position 438: ordinal not in range(128)

---

maru (talk) contribs 04:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Reply to above: It doesn't seem to affect Mozilla Firefox, as it runs the quote perfectly. Have the bots tried Mozilla Firefox to see if the link works? --D.F. Williams 11:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

There's already a (much smaller) link to a real-time stock quote, via Google, in the article. Is there a reason to put the WSJ link in as well? --LarryMac 18:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] dead link?

works fine on mozilla.