Talk:P300/CBP
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hedgehog33 04:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Regarding the proposed merger of EP300 into P300/CBP, as the the two proteins P300 and EP300 are identical, I support the merger. In addition, since the P300/CBP page is essentially a superset of the of the information contained in the EP300 page, I suggest that we replace the EP300 page with a redirect to P300/CBP. Boghog2 20:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- I do not support the merger. I agree that P300 and EP300 are identical, but the P300/CBP article deals with common features of two distinct proteins, EP300 and CREBBP (also called CBP). I'd suggest leaving all three articles, but put the majority of the gene-specific information on the individual gene pages. AndrewGNF 03:51, 9 October 2007 (UTC)