User talk:P-lab

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I noticed you've uploaded Image:Image 0200.jpg and I thought I should turn your attention to a common error.
Please give uploaded images meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the image is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename your image with an intuitive name that describes the image itself. Thanks, and good editing! Stifle (talk) 18:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Photo in MacleanStewart page

Hey.

Thanks for the heads up on the photograph. It is a headshot taken by my photographer friend Joe Fox. I actually own the headshot as I am Maclean Stewart and I paid for the shot to be taken. Hope i've used the right Copyright info this time. If you need confirmation on ownership of the Image, I can get Joe to email you himself.

Thanks for your help though.

--P-lab 19:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

That's fine, but be aware that anyone can now use that image and make derivative works from it based on the license you submitted it under. Stifle (talk) 19:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Licence help

What licence should I use? --P-lab 19:18, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions for help choosing the right license. I am unable to help you in this. Stifle (talk) 21:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Newav.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Newav.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:26, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Armagh Stars

The article Armagh Stars has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Resurgent insurgent 21:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mad About Mambo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mad About Mambo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)