User talk:Oxymoron83/Archive 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contrib

Talk

Awards

E-mail

Count

If you want to contact me, please leave a message. As I would like to keep conversations together, I'll reply on my talk page if you left me a message. If I start a conversation on your talk page, I'm watching it, so you can respond there.

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikidudeman (talk) 18:21, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much again! --Oxymoron⁸³ 18:25, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Hurry

Please block the user who vandalised you! That user is making rampant vandalism edits on many pages! Navnløs 18:57, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

He received a final warning for the nazi edit to my talk page and made no edits since them. If he continues to vandalize after that, please report to WP:AIV, I'm no admin and therefore can't block anybody. --Oxymoron⁸³ 19:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC).

A quick note

Hello, I'm thebestkiano. You have probably come across me in your anti-vandalism work (I have many times!). This is a quick note to let you know that I am leaving Wikipedia due to being treated like sh*t my Admins. For details, see my talk page. Thanks for your help on Wikipedia, goodbye. Thebestkiano^T|C 22:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Translation: I AM A DRAMA QUEEN! LOOK AT MEEEEEEEE! HalfShadow 16:28, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism by 195.195.14.1

Hi, About half a month ago, a user from IP 195.195.14.1 vandalised Huddersfield Town F.C.. I am a member of staff at Greenhead College and their account has now been blocked on our system. If you notice any further vandalism from this IP address, please don't hesitate to contact me and I'll see that their account is disabled. Regards ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 16:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your efforts. I will try to do that but can't promise it as ip addresses are hard to bear in mind :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 17:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

apologies

My most humble apologies for implicating you in the edit summary here. Serves me right for trying a shortcut with popups.... —EncMstr 18:24, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem, we all sometimes have to try new things out here ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 18:34, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

Hey man im really sorry about all this my little brother was pressing buttons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.92.124.201 (talk • contribs)

Funny how it is always the little brother who is the one vandalizing. ^_^ KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:30, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I'm waiting for the first editor who is at least a little bit creative and claims it was the little sister ... --Oxymoron⁸³ 18:34, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

I find it's not always the little brother who was the one vandalising.....sometimes it was the son or young sons(yes plural) as I was once told. :D AngelOfSadness talk 18:38, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

You can count yourself lucky, some variety prevents you from being bored. :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 18:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

That's true, variety is good. I'm just waiting for the day when someone blames their pet (real or imaginary) on their own vandalism edits and then finally I'll be able to say "Yes it must have been your unicorn that redirected the apple page to Weird Al and replaced all the images with smily faces". :D AngelOfSadness talk 18:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

In all fairness for that excuse, my cat did walk across the keyboard once while I was editing an article. I removed the asinine additions she created before I saved. But what if she had done it while I was getting a drink and I failed to notice it until it was already saved?! :P KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 19:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

See now an excuse like that is believable and possibly happens every week to many pet owners all over the world. Its the people who blame their goldfish on edits like this. AngelOfSadness talk 19:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

That's why I'm going to create a Category:Banned Wikipedia pets and Wikipedia:List of banned pets now. --Oxymoron⁸³ 19:29, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

LOL, just so you know, I've enshrined you in my personal Hall of fame right here. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 19:52, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Yay so my well thought out plan worked out perfectly then :P. I think a board should also be set up to fight pet vandalism called WP:Administrator intervention against pet vandals. AngelOfSadness talk 19:56, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Great now I have to make an amendment to it!! :P KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 19:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Now you see what a vandal, claiming his little brother did the edits, is able to wreak ;) btw, funny subpage. --Oxymoron⁸³ 20:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey!

Hello there. You're doing some great work recently. I've bumped into you reverting vandalism 5 times this evening, you always get there before I do! Keep up the good work. You might see me around! Lunchscale 19:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Yes, I see the most vandalism reverters in the RCs. --Oxymoron⁸³ 19:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Globalization

Nice work out there. :-) Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 20:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Hehe, I got several edit conflicts (and others too I think) :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 20:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

wow

Wow these vandals are surely active today. My fingers are about to fall off lol. good job on what ur doing as well. I noticed you are dealing with vandals on ur page to go along with the other load you have. The Anti-Vandalism King 20:44, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

It's because some anti vandalism bots aren't active at the moment. Sorry, I wasn't able to figure out what you want to say with the last sentence. --Oxymoron⁸³ 20:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Latin School of Chicago

Latin School's new building was recently completed and opened. (It's no longer necessary to say that construction began recently.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.28.214 (talk • contribs) 01:01, 2 Nov 2007

This was the reason for the revert, if that was your question. And please sign your talk page contributions with ~~~~ --Oxymoron⁸³ 04:28, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Please block

This user should be blocked for vandalizing the article Jim Crow laws per your warnings. futurebird 14:28, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Correct, this user should be blocked to protect Wikipedia. As I'm no admin I can't block anybody, you should report to WP:AIV (instructions there). --Oxymoron⁸³ 14:31, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

My talk page

Thanks for the revert! -- SiobhanHansa 15:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem. --Oxymoron⁸³ 15:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Change

I'm sorry for making that wrong change I thought i was in the sandbox page... But that was on an other open IE sreen i had My dearest apologize Joey —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.29.5.109 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 2 Nov 2007

I can't believe that you've mistaken several other pages for the sandbox. Anyway, thanks for your note so I was able to investigate and revert the other changes you made. --Oxymoron⁸³ 16:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou

Thankyou very much for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. It is much appreciated. :-) Lradrama 18:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Lradrama 18:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 07:08, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. --Oxymoron⁸³ 07:26, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Thx

For reverting. Greetings, --Bjoern Mailbox 08:33, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Hehe, this was ages ago ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 08:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Missing headline

ups,i removed a thing from a text,sorre,didnt know that is prohibited to edit articles! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.6.42.243 (talk • contribs) 17:47, 4 Nov 2007

It isn't prohibited to edit pages, but it is prohibited to replace them with "heya!" for no good reason. And please sign your talk page contributions with ~~~~. --Oxymoron⁸³ 17:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Reply of sorts

see here Cheers. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:58, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

I've forwarded the message, hope you get it this time around. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 22:08, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Received now, thanks :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 07:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Good, now be sure to let me know what Der wants to do! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 07:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

He wants to sleep a bit. ;) Well, today would be nice or tomorrow in the morning or late evening/night. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 15:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

BarnStar!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Beaten me to the punch a few times already today! Tiddly-Tom 18:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Oxymoron⁸³ 18:45, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Your reversion of my edit in the Porridge article.

The reason you left on my talk page was the following:

"When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page."

Odd that you didn't spot "Changed Gröd to Grøt. (Gröd is not Norwegian.)" in the history page. And what could be controversial about correcting obvious faulty grammar? Ö isn't even a Norwegian letter.

I'll be courteous enough to let you redo your own reversion.

60.240.143.88 10:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

The reason for the revert was, as written at your talk page, that your edit removed [more than half of the] content from the article, probably accidentally. And your edit summary doesn't explain the removal, therefore my note was appropriate. --Oxymoron⁸³ 14:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Apparently I was a bit hasty in my reaction. Since I seem to be in the wrong, I apologise.

60.240.143.88 23:24, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem, it doesn't matter so much. --Oxymoron⁸³ 13:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

*poke*

You ready to become an admin yet? We could really use the help. :) GlassCobra 17:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks :) Preparations are in progress, RfA will start in some days. --Oxymoron⁸³ 17:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Ayup. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 12:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Leave us alone

Strike-through text

Please —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.235.188.1 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 7 Nov 2007

(ec - answering to your extended comment) No IP will be blocked for one disruptive edit (except in unusual circumstances). But if there will be more vandalism edits from this IP, a block would be appropriate to protect Wikipedia. The good news is: If you create an account, you are able to continue editing although that IP might be blocked. --Oxymoron⁸³ 17:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Another RfA Spaming

Good luck for the next time! --Oxymoron⁸³ 13:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Weather Earl and Deletion Message you sent me

Please re-investigate the 'talk' page in regards to the Weather Earl Page --Melharts 18:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Already answered by FisherQueen on your talk page. --Oxymoron⁸³ 13:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

DerHexer would like to nominate you for adminship!

Trying for sysop, eh? ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 14:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

And I'll obviously support. Good luck in answering the questions :) -- lucasbfr ^talk 16:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

You've got my vote too! Good luck. :) GlassCobra 16:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Rats, I was about to nom you myself! -;) — Rlevse • Talk • 16:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

(ec)And mine! Wait... why are we voting here? ;) Gscshoyru 16:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you all :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 16:23, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

I'll deffinaly support! :) Tiddly-Tom 17:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Definitely will have my vote. Jauerback 18:23, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Good luck Stefan, you won't need it. :p You should accept it now. :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 21:09, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

I've only waited for you ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 21:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, It's Sunday I get caught up in watching football, and ignore Wikipedia for long stretches at a time! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 21:27, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

I've said the same that he doesn't need luck. .oO(telepathy) Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:23, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

I have added my support. I already assumed you were ! Hammer1980·^talk 02:00, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Oxymoron83#Questions for the candidate

I left you a couple of questions. Cheers. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Request for comment

Hi, I was wondering if you could take a look at a request for comment on the St Mark's College discussion page.

This is the result of an ongoing dispute and I think the more people we get to comment, the better chance we'll have of resolving the issue once and for all. You're comments would be much appreciated. Cheers. Username nought 12:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

User 76.29.23.218

Thanks for reverting this user's vandalism. If you notice his contributions, they are all vandalism. I tried to request a block, but the process wasn't clear to me. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks

Theteachersson 20:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC) Theteachersson

This user has stopped vandalizing after the level3 warning, so no immediate action is necessary. If he continues to vandalize, you should give a final warning (templates can be found here); if he vandalizes afterwards again and is active at the moment you detect these edits, you can report to WP:AIV: click on the 'edit' link right to the 'user reported' headline and you'll find an example. Regards --Oxymoron⁸³ 20:27, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Caffeine award

Slakr's Caffeine Award For helping out during a time when everyone else seemed asleep, I award you some caffeine for your exceptional effort. I probably would have considered giving you crack, but then you might have start reverting contribs by random people, which probably would have been a bad thing. :P Keep up the great work, and cheers =) --slakr\ talk / 16:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Oxymoron⁸³ 16:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

And here I was thinking I was special. :D KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 16:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Only 0.000267% of all registered accounts have this award at their talk page, I think we can nevertheless say that we are special :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 20:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello!

I copy the code into my monobook css but I don't have the "vandal fighter" that I use into the spanish wiki! Can you help to install it? Thanks! --RoyFocker 17:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

At the moment you only have the css — used to describe the style of document presentation — there. If you want the scripts, you may copy the content of Usuario:RoyFocker/monobook.js to RoyFocker/monobook.js. But this isn't recommended, as you probably will have Spanish edit summaries. You can take a look at WP:JS and assemble your own script collection. The most scripts (if not all) from the Spanish Monobook-Suite can be found there. You may like this multifunctional revert/tagging for deletion/reporting script, popups and Lupin/recent2.js. Alternatively you can try out this script collection. Instructions for installing can be found at the related pages; if you have questions, please ask again. --Oxymoron⁸³ 20:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

OK. It works... thank you very much!! RoyFocker 11:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Heh

[1] Subtle, but funny. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, it's more or less a running gag on de:wp. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 21:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

And also here. --Oxymoron⁸³ 21:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Smile

NHRHS2010 talk 05:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the smile! --Oxymoron⁸³ 07:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

I smiled at you after seeing that you reverted some vandalism on the page Melanie. In fact, Melanie is the name of my best friend. NHRHS2010 talk 11:11, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Edit count tool

Hey! Loved that really nice edit count tool you cited [2]. Just an "odd" question, curious if it counts "deleted" edits or not (those made to pages that have been deleted), which would probably account for the discrepancy between that count and my unofficial one. Heck of a lot better than the wannabe_kate! SkierRMH 08:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Originally I found it in a post from KnowledgeOfSelf. This also counts the deleted edits and equals the count at Special:Preferences. This tool shows more edits, don't know how this comes about. --Oxymoron⁸³ 08:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Pretty good for a sock ;)... I've been accused of being a bot before, so this is something new!! I just have to decide now who my alter ego is! The possibilities are endless ;0) SkierRMH 00:11, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

I help you to refine the possibilities a bit. Simply choose one from this list :-þ --Oxymoron⁸³ 07:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

RfA

I considered not spamming talk pages but not saying "thanks" just isn't me. The support was remarkable and appreciated. I only hope that I am able to help a little on here. Please let me know if I can help you or equally if you find any of my actions questionable. Thanks & regards --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:38, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

I don't care if I'm early!

Since I never get to beat Deskana, I'm going to congratulate you early! Great RfA, you really deserve it! Ariel♥Gold 13:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Ha, I may as well too. Tell the wizard to re-add his. :P KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 13:30, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you both, I think the promotion will be later (time of the transclusion to the main RfA page I think). I hope this won't turn the tight ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 13:38, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm not able to identify the time. Congrats again, —DerHexer (Talk) 14:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Reading this article will help you to avoid further mistakes :þ --Oxymoron⁸³ 14:47, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Pff, hab einfach die Stunde meiner Computerzeit+1 gerechnet und nicht −1. ;) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:08, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Actually, quick! Someone round up ten more people so we can have a hundred!

Seriously, though, an early congrats. You really deserve it. Gscshoyru (talk) 14:38, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Another early congrats. I agree with Gscshoyru, lets get 100 Supporters AFUSCO 18:46, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

declined RFAs

Just wondering why you declined your previous RFAs as you were very qualified for adminship well before your current RFA started AFUSCO 18:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

In my opinion a candidate normally should be active at least half a year before becoming an admin at that wiki. And we will never find out if an earlier RfA would have been successful ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 20:12, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations

I'm pleased to inform you that you are now an administrator. Please read all the material on the administrators' reading list before testing out your new privileges. For instructions, please see the administrators' how-to guide. Best of luck — Dan | talk 22:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 22:19, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

All fired up and at the ready!

Yayy - congratulations!! Well deserved, too. Welcome to the team :) - Alison ^❤ 22:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Well done on your successful adminship. :D AngelOfSadness talk 22:46, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations! Now get to work! :P GlassCobra 22:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Ahh this is great! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 02:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Lol, just getting used to the new features ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 02:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Congrats! Jauerback (talk) 16:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Many thanks to all :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 16:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

76.9.40.57

Thankyou for your intervention with 76.9.40.57. --Jab843 (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 00:47, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Congrats!

Congratulations on becoming an admin! Here's a smiley face to help when those times of frustration come. Don't ware out your keyboard and mouse too quickly with all those new buttons! Good luck! Icestorm815 (talk) 03:15, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 03:19, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you so much for responding to my request to have the Philippines article semi-protected! :)

--SilentAria ^talk 03:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 03:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

My Talk Page

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. Irmgard (talk) 10:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Gern geschehen :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 14:30, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

3RR question

I deleted unsourced material from Husbands and Knives and this user rvted it 3 times, i gave him the warnings (which he deleted off his talk page) what can be done to people that keep adding unsourced material. Can i be blocked for 3RR for deleting unsourced material? Ctjf83 17:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Asking for sources is reasonable. Nevertheless you shouldn't revert once more. I put another 3rr warning on Tuntis' talk page with the request to add the sources and will watch the situation for now. --Oxymoron⁸³ 17:38, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

If I may - insist on sources. While not strictly policy it, should be considered IMO. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 17:47, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

I don't want to tell you how to do your job, but you might want to give User:71.56.219.142 more time, as he will prob vandalize your page along with mine after the block expires as he did to Mr.Z-man Ctjf83 01:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

3 days are ok for the second block; if he comes back, he will be reblocked. --Oxymoron⁸³ 01:14, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Is there a certain procedure to fallow when blocking? I've seen users block indef. on the first time and others that never do that, after extreme repeats, or is it just up to your discretion? Ctjf83 01:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

See WP:BLOCK#Duration_of_blocks. It's not fully clear atm if this is a static ip, too less edits. To triple the lenght of the previous block is appropriate in this case. IPs are generally not indef blocked (excluding WP:OP). Again: The IP can be reblocked, if it will be back. --Oxymoron⁸³ 01:34, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

so if i see that use vand again, can i give them a final warning, the first time after the block? Ctjf83 01:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, better a 4im-warning; and adding "Vandalism directly after release of block" or something like that to the AIV report would be excellent. --Oxymoron⁸³ 01:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Missing headline 2

Hey, I got a note from you mentioning that I had edited the page about H. L. Mencken. In fact, I have not even visited this page. This must be a problem with shared IP's. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.181.12.116 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 19 Nov 2007

Yes, probably you use a dynamic IP address; I left the message some days ago for another person. --Oxymoron⁸³ 19:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Your block on User:142.179.109.74

Seems to be back as User:172.216.101.152, still vandalizing the same part of Plate tectonics, still from AOL UK.LeadSongDog (talk) 20:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Unlikely, the first IP is from another provider. The second IP has made only 1 edit & received no warning, no action required at the moment; but thanks for watching. --Oxymoron⁸³ 20:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank You A Lot!

I was accessing wikipedia from school, and someone (Deathtotheinternet) deleted a page. I know who it is its a known hacker so you should consider blocking or freezing that account. Thank yo for lifting the ban, do you know of any ways to access Wikipedia from a school computer with a different IP then the rest of the school? It would be appreciated if you had any information. Again thank you for lifting the ban. One last question, is there anyway I could get into a "class" or training or anything to become an editor and fixer like you are for Wikipedia? I hate people like deathtotheinternet, its an extreme nusince(SP?).

Thank You Very Much,
CrazySain--CrazySain^CrazySain 04:12, 19 November 2007 (EST)

That account has been blocked indefinitely (That's why you've been autoblocked). You can take a look at the welcome page to learn some basics. You can also be adopted. --Oxymoron⁸³ 21:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Another Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Many edits very quickly, even greater increase since his RFA AFUSCO 22:41, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Oxymoron⁸³ 22:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

warning >???

any reason why i am the only one getting warning from you in this "edit war" ? discrimination?? !!! 71.99.128.239 (talk)

You disagree with 2 other editors and made the most reverts, that's why I warned you first. If this continues, I can act further. --Oxymoron⁸³ 01:20, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

3RR

Hi, sorry, but it is not a 3RR case, it is an obvious vandalism [3]. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 01:11, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

He is also a banned troll. He's been doing this since at least february, and has accumulated no less than 8 blocks on various IPs since then. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:13, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

No obvious vandalism. Do you have any links that confirm the 'banned troll'? --Oxymoron⁸³ 01:20, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

He is removing short-form of the name of the republic. It is an obvious vandalism, it's not a disagreement. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 01:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

(ec)It all began with this incident back in february, for which (along with general incivility) 71.99.120.132 (talk · contribs) was blocked. My first encounter with this user was in September with 71.99.137.24 (talk · contribs). His contributions were marked by general incivility, and a penchant for edit warring in place of even the slightest amount of discussion. He was blocked twice for these actions. He hopped around several other IPs in the 71.99.xxx.xxx range from then until now, accumulating another 7 blocks for roughly identical edits. I refer to him as a banned troll because most admins who have seen my reports of him have blocked him on sight. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

A link to that IP user page when reporting would be fine. As the long retention period at AIV has shown, I'm not the only admin who hasn't heard about that. --Oxymoron⁸³ 01:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Veeramanidasan

Hi Oxy, this is regarding Veeramanidasan wikipage which was recently getting vandalize by a person. It seems like you declined my requests which is quite shocked to me. As i mention, the user did not provide enough justification and reference. Since the page is contributed for a Living Person, the biography that i added was also re-edited to a talk page sentence which is totally out of sence. I have advised the user on the wikipage talk not to violate futher on the edits after a few edit warning, i requested for a page protection and its been declined by you. Please advise how i should proceed futher. I do not want to start edit war with the user and hoping to come to a conclusion. Your advise is highly appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Killerserv (talk • contribs) 04:27, 20 Nov 2007

Not to start an edit war is a good idea. If you don't come to a conclusion at the discussion page, I advise to make a demand on WP:RFC or WP:RFM. I think you both are rational enough to resolve this problem without a page protection and an user block. And please sign your talk page contributions. --Oxymoron⁸³ 04:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Just wanted to say thanks for taking action against 66.142.140.27. Apologies for not using the template. Pyrofork (talk) 22:34, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Really no problem. Also it would be nice if you could sign the warnings you give, so that we can easier see the time the warning has been given. Thanks --Oxymoron⁸³ 22:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah, yeah I see have I forgotten a couple times. Will do. Thanks. Pyrofork (talk) 22:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Protecting 'Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus'

Hi,

Can you explain on its talk page why you protected this article?

There is some edit warring going on, but not very heavy (for the standards of this article). Also I am a participant in a mediation case, but that concerns actually only the use of one source on this page, and is irrelevant to the present edit warring.

Therefore I was wondering about your motivation.

Regards, --JaapBoBo (talk) 22:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

I've protected the article as an uninvolved admin due to the recent precipitance in reverting without prior discussion. A couple of editors are involved, you too. The page protection has been requested at WP:RFPP. Please add issues to be mediated to the mediation page or find consensus at the talk page. Thanks --Oxymoron⁸³ 23:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Port Adelaide Football Club

You do not seem to understand what goes on on this site. It is regularly edited by fans of the opposing team in Adelaide. They spend considerable time trying to tarnish the tradition of Port Adelaide and making sure poor performances are highlighted. Why is it neccesary to highlight the losing score of the 2007 grand final? Why is there so much rubbish about the 2007 heritage round. This is one round that is played every year by all 16 clubs but is only highlighted on the Port site because the Crows fans want to take a cheap shot at Port.

In 2007 Port finished 2nd of 16 after finishing 12th the year before. This is an improvement rarely seen in AFL football. However due to biased unfavorable editing, 2007 on Wikipedia basically carries on about a couple of old players views of the heritage round and the large loss in the grand final.

If you google other famous sporting events for the largest loss in the final you have to dig deep to find what the score was. Googlr the AFL grand final and all you get is the myriad of posts by crows supporters.

Cheers Steve —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.39.149.246 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 21 Nov 2007

Hello Steve, I understand your position, but you disagree with several other editors, so I protected the page for some days to cool things down a bit. I can see only 2 edits on the article's talk page from you; please try to find consensus there. After the protection has expired, you can edit the page again, but please don't continue to make the same changes without discussing first. --Oxymoron⁸³ 01:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Thanks for cheering me up

Another day, another of my bots gone insane... such is the life of Wikipedia's laziest admin. east.718 at 02:50, November 21, 2007

Gade Nou Leve International Vodou Sosyete

there are bands featured on wikipedia, and we get deleted? I am sure you are used to deletion complaints aren't you? All that POWER. WOW SO glad I never did donate to this. Houngan (talk) 07:23, 21 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Houngan (talk • contribs) 07:20, 21 Nov 2007

Your article was about a group, that doesn't meet our notability guidelines. Also bands have to meet some standards to have a page on Wikipedia. Also note that you have a conflict of interest. And please sign your talk page contributions using ~~~~. Thanks --Oxymoron⁸³ 07:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

right right right, hypocrisy - I would cite the examples of articles that do not comply with those guidelines being present, but that would be a waste of time. And don't you dare patronize me telling to sign pages any which way, do you understand?

Giusepe 415

Thanks for reverting the abuse on my editor review page! I regarded this as an entirely unacceptable personal attack / death threat, and have indef blocked accordingly. If there had been any sign of productive edits from the account before, I might have considered a shorter block, but he was clearly only here to cause trouble. Regards, Bencherlite^Talk 08:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

I got an edit conflict with you when also trying to indef block :) Look at his deleted edits. Cheers --Oxymoron⁸³ 08:51, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

I did! Glad to hear that you were going for the block button too - as a new admin I haven't blocked for personal attacks before, let alone an attack on myself, so I'm pleased to hear that you would have done the same anyway. Thanks. Bencherlite^Talk 08:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Lol, you are nearly twice as long admin as I am ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 08:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

!!! Bencherlite^Talk 09:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

(back from reading your RfA) Yes, but you had nearly three times the support I did. <sulk/> Bencherlite^Talk 09:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

I suppose not... after all, nobody opposed me! <runs away> Bencherlite^Talk 09:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

/me is too lazy and gives up. --Oxymoron⁸³ 09:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

hi

hi i had written some content on Jojy and it was deleted

it was not complete yet and can i have the content back?

Tc jojy1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jojykk (talk • contribs) 11:20, 21 Nov 2007

Please read our inclusion guidelines about people first and explain, why you think this person should have an article on Wikipedia. Thanks --Oxymoron⁸³ 11:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Anti-Vandal

I would like to help prevent wikipedia from being damaged is there any way i can help ? please reply to me in user talk

Mr.whiskers (talk) 15:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Done; thanks to Ariel, nice page :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 20:30, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Why another warning?!?

Nanagirl55 had received three, and continued. Why another warning, when all others were flouted?!? Mr Which^??? 23:31, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

I fixed this loooong time ago. [4] --Oxymoron⁸³ 23:32, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Never mind. Still not sure about leaving a warning when you were going to block indef, but it's all good! Thanks, Mr Which^??? 23:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

After blocking, I had mistakenly chosen 'uw-vand3' instead of 'uw-block3' first, but corrected this seconds later. --Oxymoron⁸³ 23:37, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Got it! Thanks for acting so quickly. Mr Which^??? 23:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem. --Oxymoron⁸³ 00:01, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

hello

excuse me why do you keep deleting my band's page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hobbyhorses (talk • contribs) 16:27, 22 Nov 2007

hello

excuse me this is very confusing you keep deleting a page about my band that i am trying to put on here. are you doing this for your own amusement or what? please stop!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hobbyhorses (talk • contribs) 16:34, 22 Nov 2007

Because you didn't mention in the article why this band is notable enough to have an article at Wikipedia. Some guidelines can be found here. And please sign your talk page contributions using ~~~~--Oxymoron⁸³ 16:34, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

i havent even finished it yet! i was just checking to see if i was doing it correctly. at least let me finish the god damn page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hobbyhorses (talk • contribs) 16:35, 22 Nov 2007

I'm not the only person who has deleted that article. If you post the same content over and over again, this will only lead to a block of your account. If you think that your band is notable (see the link above), you should finish the article first (with a sourced claim of notability) and afterwards click 'save'. Thanks --Oxymoron⁸³ 16:39, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

well instead of just deleting it straight away, you could have at least sent a message or something letting me know where im going wrong. for a moderator you lot arent very helpful. it just seems like none of you have anything better to do other than racing each to see who can delete articles before anyone else does. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hobbyhorses (talk • contribs) 16:46, 22 Nov 2007

You've already received such a message from NawlinWiki and didn't respond. Instead of asking someone about things that remained unclear, you are reposting the article within minutes despite further warnings. Please read WP:BAND now. --Oxymoron⁸³ 16:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

cheers for 'helping' out someone who has only been on here for 5 minutes. i have no idea what is going on here on why you're picking on me it must be a sad hobby of yours to have a go at new people just because they dont quite know what theyre doing yet. fuck it. im coming for you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hobbyhorses (talk • contribs) 16:59, 22 Nov 2007

I'm not picking on you. Now please follow the links at your talk page, the one I've given you here and accept my advice to sign your talk page contributions. Thanks --Oxymoron⁸³ 17:13, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Vinxx socks

One last thing on, User:Vinxx appears to be the puppet master and was blocked yesterday but only for 72 hours [5]. This was before all of the socks. I just wanted to bring this to your attention to determine if the block should be extended. It does not matter to me, I was just patrolling new users, but I thought I would bring it to the attention of an admin. Regards.--12 Noon 20:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

First of all, thanks for attention. I've left Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry a message. I tend to extend the block, but want to hear his opinion regarding the length. --Oxymoron⁸³ 20:34, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

I blocked as a 'slap on the wrist'. Edits like this are generally full of emotion, and I didn't want to appear biased. If the user is now using socks, however, perhaps a longer block is in order. I was hoping a 72 hour block would dissuade him or her from making charged edits again - obviously not! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 20:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

I've reviewed each of her/his edits (everywhere the same political POV, no talk page edits to find consensus) and — regarding the severity level of these changes — extended to 72 months. --Oxymoron⁸³ 21:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Oxy

For the revert. How are you liking the tools thus far? KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 01:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem, you've beaten me to the block. The tools are very useful, and due to vacations this week I use them very often. I hope my actions help Wikipedia a bit. I try to review my decisions (later watching what had happened afterwards) and am normally pleased, but some input from outside (best per mail) would also be much appreciated if one of my decisions has caught your eye. Cheers --Oxymoron⁸³ 01:28, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I've been watching your use of the tools thanks to my watchlist which you pop up all over. You're doing great, keep it up. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 02:37, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 02:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

BTW I added your user and user talk pages to the watchlist of the CVU on IRC. With them being attacked so often and all. :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, that's a good idea ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 18:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, poor Oxymoron gets hit pretty hard, he always has, lol. That is really nice to have it on the IRC watchlist! Ariel♥Gold 18:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

~*Giggle*~ [13:34] #cvn-wp-en: <+MiszaBot> Whitelist [[User:ArielGold]] Edited watched page [[User talk:Oxymoron83]] (353) Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AOxymoron83&diff=173322720&oldid=173322467 "/* Thanks Oxy */ Yeah, poor Oxymoron" Ariel♥Gold 18:35, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

LOL --Oxymoron⁸³ 18:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Signature

Thanks for notifying me. I've fixed it. Dekisugi (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. --Oxymoron⁸³ 16:22, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Opinion on Sweet's blanking of your warning

Am I wrong to restore this? Thanks, Mr Which^??? 17:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Registered users are allowed to remove their warnings, but as I watch the most users I've reverted, this shouldn't be a problem. --Oxymoron⁸³ 17:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

My mistake. I'll not revert the blanking anymore. Mr Which^??? 17:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem. --Oxymoron⁸³ 17:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Foreign Policy Digest

Hello, Oxymoron83 ... you reverted Foreign Policy Digest (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) after it was blanked by the author, Jcoleman04 (talk · contribs), so I tagged it with {{db-author}} ... just an FYI. :-) Happy Editing! —141.156.234.101 (talk · contribs) 18:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes I know, but I didn't want to delete it/decide this alone, as the content has already been published under the GFDL. --Oxymoron⁸³ 18:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, it looked like a WP:CSD#G7 to me, so I'm just following my deletion warnings protocol and responding to their response to my attempt at start a dialog about improving this article (their only response being to blank the article.) —141.156.234.101 (talk) 18:59, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I don't doubt that this page meets CSD-G7. But if there seems to be at least a some keepworthy content (which e.g. can be included into another article; or notability unclear), I don't delete that on my own account for the above mentioned reason. --Oxymoron⁸³ 19:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

The first issue came out just this month ... Wikipedia is not a crystal ball ... maybe it will be notable in a few months, but it isn't right now. —141.156.234.101 (talk) 19:29, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Hah!

You fell for it! Maybe now I can get in some reverts... :-P —Animum (talk) 19:48, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

That's high praise coming from Animum A.K.A damn you animum grr that revert was mine! ;) Animum will understand that KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 20:02, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Or maybe me! Will ^(talk) 19:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Anyone else? ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 19:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

No. :-P —Animum (talk) 19:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Now there's a significant lack of vandalism... Will ^(talk) 19:51, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

... what also has a good side! --Oxymoron⁸³ 19:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I Can't beat him to revert vandalism, thats how fast he is. Also he has gotten even better since his successful RFA. Alexfusco5 19:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Another day another Barnstar for Oxymoron83 Alexfusco5 19:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! The admin revert is even faster than I've dreamed of. --Oxymoron⁸³ 19:59, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Red Barn Murder linking

Perhaps a hidden message advising people not to wikilink Maria Marten and William Corder, since both names redirect back to the Red Barn? If a hidden message were put in at the top, people would stop linking the two names. What do you think? ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 20:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, sounds like a good idea. --Oxymoron⁸³ 20:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Are you interested in doing it? I would, but, never having done it before, I am not familiar with the formatting. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 20:28, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Done --Oxymoron⁸³ 21:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, you beat me to it! I decided to have a go at it myself, and had just started, when I noticed in another window that you were done. Well, at least I know now for the future. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 22:04, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay, I was busy dealing with a lot of vandalism at that time :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 23:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

No worries! Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 03:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry About That

That edit I made to Template:Csstle Rock, Colorado was not an intention of vandalisim.

I Apologize--Sweet100000 (talk) 20:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Accepted, but now please start doing some constructive edits. --Oxymoron⁸³ 20:35, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

page p.

Thanks for protecting my userpage. The prat who is harrasing me, and going the extra mile by creating bogus accounts like "cf35" or "cf37" might stop, although I doubt it, because I think the neanderthal is using a proxy.

Thanks,

Cf38 (talk) 21:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I've added them to WP:OP. I don't know much about OP, but especially this looks interesting. --Oxymoron⁸³ 23:06, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Splicers (Disambiguation)

I created that page because I was beginning a major rewrite of the Splicers page; I noted that in the creation notes. As such, the information contained in it would've been removed from the Splicers page, as having nothing to do with the expanded material. I would appreciate it if you could return it from deleted status until I finish my article on Splicers (the rpg), which will be in a publishable form tonight. ----Mr. Nexx (talk) 05:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

The page contained only a poor dicdef and was additionally a GFDL copyvio. Nothing to restore there. --Oxymoron⁸³ 05:27, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Grumble

You know, your being an admin is bad for my blocking average. Before you used to report vandals to WP:AIV and I blocked them quite happily - hence lots of blocks :-) ... Now not only are you not reporting vandals for me to block, you're blocking those that are reported before I can. I think that's rather mean ;-).

Seriously though, keep up the good work. WjBscribe 06:24, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Hehe, thanks. But the following week, when my vacations are over, you can increase your blocking count again :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 06:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

I don't know about you Will, but I'm enjoying the break from AIV that Oxy here is providing! :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 08:18, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

You can take turns: One is sidetracking me at my talk page, the other one cleans AIV in the meantime and vice versa ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 08:37, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

vandal

Hi - I saw you gave a short block to 172.167.243.224 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) just now for vandalism - I just looked at his edits and reverted more vandalism by him, and this appears to be the same user as GoMJ1234 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) who was blocked a few minutes ago for vandalizing the same articles as this IP just vandalized - one page he vandalized is User:Malik Shabazz - Malik Shabazz had warned GoMJ1234 about GoMJ1234's vandalism and he retaliated by vandalizing Malik's page; same thing for the IP. Personally, I'd recommend a longer block for the IP than 3 hours - it's clearly a vandalism-only editor. Just thought I'd bring the specifics to your attention. Tvoz |talk 08:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I've seen that he used that other account before, that's why I've blocked although he didn't vandalize after the level4 warning. But it's an AOL-IP, that changes every some minutes; what means (if that WHOIS is updated), he/she will have another IP soon, and possibly another user who will have been assigned this IP will be blocked for nothing. --Oxymoron⁸³ 08:11, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

I just found out, that these 172.128.0.0/10 —AOL-IPs are "normal" shared IPs now (WP:AOL), what however doesn't change anything on the block length. --Oxymoron⁸³ 08:22, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah - I hadn't looked at the IP details. This is a recurring problem that we really need to find a solution for - the vandals get away with it because we don't want to cause collateral damage - I understand the logic of that, but it's frustrating. Thanks for the reply. Meanwhile, I have the pages he's vandalized on my watchlist, and won't be surprised if he attacks mine or yours as this is his pattern. Tvoz |talk 08:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

There are also page protections and range blocks as a last resort ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 08:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

ClubTropica

You recently removed ClubTropica from Wiki, I am in no way inflicted with ClubTropica nor care if it is promoted. I posted the FACTS and this was advertising only in your opinion, you did not give me time to state my reasoning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clubtropicawiki (talk • contribs) 12:39, 24 Nov 2007

The article was as promotional as it gets (example: "it's the perfect place to relax and we guarantee no cold weather or dreary rain!"). --Oxymoron⁸³ 12:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

That user has been indef blocked. Good afternoon. From Hencetalk (talk) 12:50, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I know. Your report lead me to the article. --Oxymoron⁸³ 12:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

IP from Phillipines

please block the ip of the page we both edited on. he is a persistent vandal who shall be punished for his actions. Tech43 (talk) 07:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

What page? Which IP? --Oxymoron⁸³ 07:07, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

User:125.60.243.31 is the IP. Tech43 (talk) 07:14, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

No. First: No final warning given. Second it's a shared IP, that means the person who vandalized could be someone other. Third, we never block anyone to punish him/her. --Oxymoron⁸³ 07:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Are you insulting me with your third comment? Seems like it to me. Tech43 (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:BLOCK - first sentence. --Oxymoron⁸³ 07:31, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Are you blocking me? Tech43 (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC) I apologize for my actions on this page, and that one. I have talked to the user, and have apologized. thanks for the help. sayonarra. Tech43 (talk) 07:47, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem. --Oxymoron⁸³ 07:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Stupid Club

Hi, this is the author of the Stupid Club article. I don't know how to give credit to sources, but I can tell you that the Stupid Club quote from Kurt Cobain's mother is mentioned in Heavier Than Heaven: A Biography of Kurt Cobain. If you could help me site it I'd be much appreciative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tehphoenixdown (talk • contribs) 07:10, 25 Nov 2007

I've already put 1 link (reliable sources) on your talk page, you may also read citing sources. Solely the quote doesn't make this subject notable enough to have an own article. Regards --Oxymoron⁸³ 07:16, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the help

Nice job sniffing out those socks, I've protected the pages being attacked, should be alright for a while, cheers. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 09:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Amendment—he just moved on to an other related topic. Oh well he'll be blocked and get bored sooner or later. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 09:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you too. BTW (this has time until that one has given up), do you think that 69.143.226.129 (talk · contribs), imo a sock of 69.143.236.33 (talk · contribs) per contributions and edit summary, should also be blocked for (at least) 1 month? The IP he switched to seems also a static one. Caution: The diffs of the edits to their talk pages are huge. --Oxymoron⁸³ 10:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes I agree, block to your wiki-hearts content. :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 10:04, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

I've blocked him for 350 hours. Odds are he'll just force a switch to an other IP, when that happens drop the ban hammer again. All you can do really. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 10:12, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

OK, we'll see if he's able to. --Oxymoron⁸³ 10:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Missing headline 3

Why must i have my name removed from december the 8th just because i'm not famous? are famous people all that matter in this world? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.182.34 (talk • contribs) 11:49, 25 Nov 2007

Only people who are notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia can be added to these lists. What do you think will happen if we allow everyone to put their name in there? --Oxymoron⁸³ 11:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Missing headline 4

why do you deleted promobikes? aistis[at]masina.lt —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aistis (talk • contribs) 12:47, 25 Nov 2007

Because it was a copyright infringement of a blatant advertisement. --Oxymoron⁸³ 12:50, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

club penguin??

hi there. i just was viewing this article...about an actress in a james bond film and up the top it said "you have new messages" i had never seen that on the many articles i had viewed before that one...

it said to stop vandalising Club Penguin...the thing is, i dont know what Club Penguin is, ive never even heard of it, and i havent been onto their page.

i dont know whats happening here?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.215.21.119 (talk • contribs) 13:30, 25 Nov 2007

You use a dynamic IP address; my message from May 2007 was directed to the person who was assigned this IP address at that moment. Regards --Oxymoron⁸³ 13:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

I've also left the user a comment. [6] Cheers. :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 13:43, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I think I will make a template for this answer; this is around the 30th time that I was asked that question ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 13:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

You know that's not a half bad idea at all. I'd use it! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 13:57, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

The great restitution of the centrality of Dharma

Halo Oxymoron93: I am endeavouring to rename four pages but as there are already redirection pages with the names I would like to call them the "move" functionality does not work. If you could please be so gracious as to inform me how to initiate a transition that ensures the entire integrity of the page and its associated discourse are translated I would be most appreciative. All glories to you are yours B9 hummingbird hovering ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

You should find consensus at the talk page and afterwards request the move. Moving pages via cut&paste is unacceptable. You already have those links at your talk page. --Oxymoron⁸³ 14:06, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Flair Bartending

Hi Oxymoron83,

please do not remove links about Flair Bartending, those are integrated part of the Flair Bartending History and they daily contribute to spread the word of flair. These links are NOT SPAM, we are working hard to contribute to Wikipedia in several articles as well as to create useful content in our websites about bartending. What do you know about Flair Bartending? If you know a little bit about it, and you have visited the links we post, you would not remove them because you will realize that those are the most interesting and visited sites about this unusual sport. Please do NOT remove links about Flair Bartending anymore...

Thanks a lot for understanding.

Best Regards

Richard —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.180.52.248 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 25 Nov 2007

Did you take the time to read our guidelines for external links? Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Please do NOT add these links about Flair Bartending anymore... Thank you. --Oxymoron⁸³ 14:12, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you - Regarding SSEAYP

Thanks for your note and for welcoming me to WIKIPEDIA. I did not copy the works or articles from other pages - I compiled and edited them. I did not say I authored them. The SSEAYP page was meant for information and reference not advertisement. But because it was deleted I felt I do not deserve to contribute or edit the SSEAYP Page. But again, thanks for your help and your comment. I deeply appreciate it. I apologize if I was wrong by adding my talk/s several times and so disappointed that I told of copying works of others although I just compiled them. Jbsantos 11-24-07 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbsantos (talk • contribs) 17:55, 25 Nov 2007

Apology accepted. You've copy&pasted complete sections from other websites, this is clearly a copyright violation. Please follow the links that you have on your talk page to learn more how to write good articles. Regards --Oxymoron⁸³ 22:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again

They love me—almost as much as they love Antandrus. I appreciate it as always. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 00:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

At least some appreciation for the work ;) I wonder why "Britney" vandalized my user space only 2 times, but this can change... --Oxymoron⁸³ 00:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the deletion of User:Ludds/Friends UBX

Thank you! I hope things go great in the future! Ludds (talk) 00:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem. I like to delete uncontroversial things ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 00:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

"Thrust Vectoring"; What is the status of my November 25, 07 contribution?

November 26, 2007, 10:34pm Hello Oxymoron83, Editor of "Thrust Vectoring";

What is the status of my November 25, 07 contribution? Please ignore my previous contributions on this subject that were a first-time attempts and let me know the status of the last one from November 25, which is inline with Wikipedia standards and instructions. Just to be sure, I re-introduce it here-below, with just 2 minor corrections adding s to 'nozzle' and replacing the example B-2 with X-36. Anticipating your response, I remain, sincerely Prof. Dr. Benjamin Gal-Or

Moved to subpage User:Oxymoron83/Thrust vectoring, this really overruns the purpose of a user talk page. Discussion can take place here. --Oxymoron⁸³ 23:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Re: The Ship for SouthEast Asian Youth Program (SSEAYP)

Thanks for your note. I will try my very best to correct the page for the sake of the young people of SouthEast Asia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbsantos (talk • contribs) 01:41, 27 Nov 2007

No problem, but please ensure first that this program is notable enough to have an article here. --Oxymoron⁸³ 10:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Matt mckillip

Hey, would you mind deleting this page for me? Thanks....Tiptoety (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Tiptoety (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem :) --Oxymoron⁸³ 00:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Colorado Academy

Unfortunately it was the most recent clean version I could find, sometimes it's amazing how keen these editors can be to make loads of vandalistic edits at once. Sometimes it's easier simply to revert all IP edits at once. Bobo. 01:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Help

Hey I have been having problems with this IP. The IP has been attacking me constantly while I have been off line and as so I have not been able to revert the attacks and report the IP properly. I was wondering if you could watch or block the IP because this has been going on for some time and has been escalating Rgoodermote  11:46, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

I've blocked for 31 hours due to other personal attacks I've found in older contributions (looks like all of them were made by the same person). A longer block can be issued if he/she continues after another final warning. --Oxymoron⁸³ 11:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, but I have to say that the IP is most likely going to continue for whatever reason, I didn't even warn the IP before the attacks. Rgoodermote  13:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

U Dodged up me page

You dodgified my page. Make sure it doesen't happen again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.253.48.1 (talk • contribs) 12:25, 28 Nov 2007

If you stop to make unconstructive edits, this won't happen again. It's up to you. --Oxymoron⁸³ 12:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Dah dee doo

Are you saying my edits aren't constructive? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.253.48.1 (talk • contribs) 12:30, 28 Nov 2007

Yes. And now do some constructive things. --Oxymoron⁸³ 12:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Re

Sure thing. Just cleaning up! ;) •97198 talk 12:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Reference help

Hi oxymoron83. I created the page Thaddeus Griffin, who is peter Griffin's brother from the tv show family guy. I have a list of references about his family (one of the sections is a list) here. But! For some reason it is not allowing me to cite the info. Could you help me with citing his family members, and because I have them all here it shouldn't take any longer than about 10 mins.

Thanks a lot;

Cf38 (talk) 13:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't get what you want to do/how I can help you. What info do you want to cite; is this a syntax problem? --Oxymoron⁸³ 14:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Take a look at the article; It contains a section about his family. A few of the members do not have a wikipedia page, but a bio on Family Guy's 'wikia' page; So, I wanted to put links (refs) about these members linking to the site with the charecters bio's on.(this is the site)

thanks,

Cf38 (talk) 14:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I think I got it. But a wikia isn't what falls under a reliable source, better you look for another "official" source. --Oxymoron⁸³ 14:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

But because of the nature of the section I wrote (his whole family) that would be extremley difficult to find. Cf38 (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

---

Basiclly it's probably the only site with his whole family on. even family guy's official site does'nt have any bio's, and without the citing, the article may be deleted.

I also wasn't able to find another source; but a reference to a Wikia won't help you in a deletion discussion (it's the same as if there were no source). Are you sure this character is notable at all? There has to be some real-world information. If you find sourced real world information, notability should be established, this is imo more important as to source the character list. --Oxymoron⁸³ 14:33, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Userpage semiprotection

Of course I don't mind, thanks very much! :) Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:02, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Template usage in Brown tree snake article

Hi. There is a non-working template (commonscat| xxx ) near the end of the article. I'm not familiar with the use of templates; could you take a look and possibly fix it? Thanks. Dougz1 (talk) 22:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

What isn't working with this? --Oxymoron⁸³ 22:53, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

I see, the template is producing the Wikimedia box. Told you I wasn't familiar with templates, lol. Sorry to send you on a wild goose chase. Dougz1 (talk) 23:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem, I'm glad if I can help (although I only had to make minimal efforts at this case ;)) --Oxymoron⁸³ 23:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Missing headline 5

Sorry about making that one page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmbdeacon (talk • contribs) 22:59, 28 Nov 2007

Hello —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.105.137.30 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 28 Nov 2007

Yay!

		The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
		I'll give you this one for variety's sake. You're really fast at reverting vandalism! vlad§inger tlk 23:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Oxymoron⁸³ 23:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

A smile for you

I know you work hard, and I'm sorry for being such a bother. 66.118.242.7 (talk) 07:22, 29 November 2007 (UTC) aka the MyvMouse

Thank you; I think it's time for you now to do some constructive work. --Oxymoron⁸³ 07:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

nOT kOOLZ

uMM hIZZZ. uHHH. yOU sO sHOULDN'T hAVE DELETED THE jOSEPH bORGMAN pAGE lolz. iT'S KOOL mAN. u r kILLANG dA vIBE —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Last Saxon (talk • contribs) 08:28, 29 Nov 2007

Speedy deletion of Tonywalton, Accounting4taste, UncleG...

Sigh. Some people just don't Get It, do they? Thanks for the quick block (which preceded mine by about 1 second! I've removed Janez_Janša's claim from their userpage that they are the Prime Minister of Slovenia as well (it seems less than likely, even though the name is the same, per http://www.kpv.gov.si/en/ ). One thing does perplex me - why was my "article" created? Presumably the vandal's watching the dletion log, or something... Ah well. Cheers, Tonywalton  | Talk 11:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. Probably it was a sock of a (persistent) nonsense page creator, as not all the users he/she created an article about are active at the moment. --Oxymoron⁸³ 11:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Save some for me

There isn't much vandalism going on that I can tell, so save a few of those reverts for me mate. Sheesh. BTW

"This page is 100 kilobytes long. It may be helpful to move older discussion into an archive subpage. See Help:Archiving a talk page for guidance."

Might be time to archive my friend. It took forever for my browser to fully load your page. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 12:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

OK, I will go shopping until rush hour starts. Tomorrow (end of month) I'm going to archive ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 12:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Diane Dodds

There is no evidence for the truth of the facts (about Saudi Arabia, adultery) in this article about a living person. I suggest leaving them out until a reference can be found.--Slp1 (talk) 12:26, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

The IP removed also non controversial sections and ignored/didn't respond to my question to give an edit summary. --Oxymoron⁸³ 12:27, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

The IP has posted it to the WP:BLP noticeboard, though would have been good to give an edit summary, too, I guess.--Slp1 (talk) 12:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

As I ever do, I prefer to explain that on the talk page. It doesn't matter if he/she had explained that on the talk page or elsewhere, every answer would have been welcome. And I didn't revert as I saw that only the controversial things have been removed. --Oxymoron⁸³ 12:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Diane Dodds

Please note that this information is totally incorrect that is why i deleted it!

even the info regarding the her Council position. At least get your facts right before publishing info about people. If this continues we will be taking legal advice on this matter. Do I make myself clear.

nee Al-Khaibari)[citation needed] is a Councillor in West Belfast for the Democratic Unionist Party. She was born in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia[citation needed]. At the age of four she fled to Northern Ireland with her mother, after her mother was accused of adultery in her homeland[citation needed]. Her mother became impressed with Ian Paisley's conservative rhetoric and converted to the Free Presbyterian faith soon after their arrival[citation needed]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.50.134 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 29 Nov 2007

Please note that making legal threats is a reason to be blocked, i suggest you withdraw this sentence. Why didn't you contact me earlier instead of just ignoring my comment on your talk page? You removed also non controversial sections and I didn't revert as I saw that you removed only the controversial things. Please sign your talk page contributions with ~~~~ Regards --Oxymoron⁸³ 17:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Adminship

Hi Oxymoron83, I've just found your rightful action (here). BTW, congratulations on your adminship. Are you the first admin who are in this category? If so then cheers man! I've always dreamt an admin in this category.--NAHID 16:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I don't know exactly about the category, but it's possible (although the classification is self-assessment) --Oxymoron⁸³ 16:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Missing headline 6

Hi, I posted the the recent Post on 'Charlie-Sloth' Why is this blatant advertising? I have plans to create a page for every UK hip-hop artist who has achieved incredible things in 2007... These artist's deserve to have there details on here when they are successful artist's in there own right.

I have showed were i sourced the info from,please assist me in this problem.

Thanks

Mark —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrinfo66 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 29 Nov 2007

First you should read our notability guidelines and cite reliable sources that establish them. The article has to be written in a neutral point of view, your text was a blatant advertisement. Please not that this is an encyclopedia and not a soapbox. --Oxymoron⁸³ 16:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar (Another One)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Reverting multiple vandalism sectuions on my homepage. --Thanks-- Redmarkviolinist (talk) 17:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, three barnstars in a row ;) --Oxymoron⁸³ 17:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Bureaucratship

	This user is currently being considered for bureaucratship. To view the discussion and voice your opinion, please visit Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Oxymoron83/Archive 3.

The Nominator (talk) 17:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the nomination and your confidence. However, I must regretfully decline. I'm admin only for some days and this is way to early. --Oxymoron⁸³ 18:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

I would support you for bureaucratship and i think many other wikipedians would agree Alexfusco5 22:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Wow. While Oxymoron is one of the best vandal fighters and funniest and friendliest people around.... waaaaaaay to early to even consider a RfB. The people love you Oxy, but wow, I'm really sort of flabbergasted that someone wants to nom you for one already. Good form declining my friend, as you said - way to early. :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 22:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Also after looking at The Nominator's contribs it strikes me as very suspicious that his/her's 17th edit is the nomination for RfB. :/ KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 00:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm wondering about a user who says when their account is created, that they "will also nominate users for Adminship if they are worthy." (no mention of AfB). All very odd. Tonywalton  | Talk 01:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I wondered about the same; also I think such nominations should be made by established users. My decline was nevertheless for another reason and would have been the same independent of the nominator. --Oxymoron⁸³ 08:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar 2

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. This barnstar is particularly about an IP address. Congratulations! --Kushalt 18:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Oxymoron⁸³ 18:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)