User talk:OwenBlacker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives |
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Irish coin 1p (1980).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Irish coin 1p (1980).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Resolved more pointless copyright paranoia. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 12:16, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] League of God's House and Three Leagues
Thanks for the comments on the article Grey League! I've created a article on the League of God's House and will eventually do one for League of the Ten Jurisdictions. If you have time, take a look at the League of God's House and see if you want to use anything in the Three Leagues or if I missed something in the article. Tobyc75 (talk) 18:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] London Meetup - January 12, 2008
Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over at Wikipedia:Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 03:04, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered sometime in January 2008 (UTC). SatyrBot (talk) 23:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Reminder/request/idea/memo/suggestion/[insert a word of your choice]
Hello! I suppose you barely remember me... Well, it has been some time, has it not? As you might guess, I am here on SBS business. Alas, I have to be a little pressing at times, no matter how much I might hate myself for it. The problem is that participation in WikiProjects is on a purely voluntary basis, so it is both highly impolite and extremely insensitive for me to be taking such steps, but... Well, call me eccentric and it's settled (I hope).
To the subject: as always, there is a severe activity deficiency in the project—too much to do, and nobody to do it. I am not as much concerned about the editing progress, as this is supposed to be done by all editors. No, I am more worried about the guidelines and the templates, where there are still many things to be taken care of, numerous holes to be closed, countless loose ends to be tied up, immeasurable improvements to be made. In four words: decisions to be made. All I am asking for is a helping hand once in a while: add the SBS page to your watchlist (if you have not done so until now), and vote in the polls; as the majority of the proposals are rather uncontroversial, polls usually suffice for business to move on. If, of course, there is the slightest disagreement (succession boxes are rather straightforward, after all), more discussion can take place, until consensus is reached in the good old Wikipedia way. The fact is that the entire process will not take up more than a few minutes of your valuable time in any given day—and it is a rare event indeed to see more than two or three proposals submitted in a week. Actually, that speed would be ideal, as things right now move at much slower rates.
If we are to note any progress, we need participation. If you are interested enough to have signed up, I am not asking for much, am I? After all, aren't we all here because we are trying to make a difference? Waltham, The Duke of 22:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
P.S.: Ever heard of hard spaces? They are required in many cases by the Manual of Style, but most editors seem to ignore them entirely. There is an initiative attempting to change this situation; click here if you are interested. – Waltham
[edit] Flagicons
I removed the flagicons you added to Anthony Fedorov per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (flags). Aspects (talk) 23:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- And I removed the flag icon you added here as it added nothing to the article. --John (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:1 New Israeli Sheqel (1994-1995).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:1 New Israeli Sheqel (1994-1995).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wappen Thal.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Wappen Thal.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 04:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:1 New Israeli Sheqel (1994-1995).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:1 New Israeli Sheqel (1994-1995).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Will someone PLEASE sort out these bloody irritating bots with their copyright paranoia so they're at least only paranoid about the right damn things?! — OwenBlacker (Talk) 11:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered by SatyrBot around 17:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC) SatyrBot (talk) 17:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:1 New Israeli Sheqel (1994-1995).jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:1 New Israeli Sheqel (1994-1995).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yet again, a buggy bot tagging an image incorrectly. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 18:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sean Gallagher
Hi, OwenBlacker! Do you have the Feb issue of Attitude referenced at Sean Gallagher? That info was originally added by an IP, so I wanted to check on it. And of course, they don't seem to have archived their issues on the web, the Ludites! Many thanks :) -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 21:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] London Meetup - April 13th
London Wikipedia Meetup number 8 is happening next Sunday lunchtime (April 13th 1pm) in Holborn. Come along!
-- Harry Wood (talk) 09:57, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Flag of Haiti civil.svg
Image:Flag of Haiti civil.svg delinked. I think I got all the usages. --- RockMFR 23:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Third Reich
I noticed that you created a map of the French Empire under Napoleon. Could you make one for Nazi Germany? The map in the template gives the divisions, but I feel that a map that gives full view of the European territories of the Reich is more appropriate. I you can't, than that's fine. However, do you known anyone else who could make it because I really do not known. --- Hpfan1 {talk) 15:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- My reply is at User talk:Hpfan1#Third Reich map; hopefully Hpfan1 will reply here ;o) — OwenBlacker (Talk) 12:50, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:9Tail Fox cover (Amazon).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:9Tail Fox cover (Amazon).jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- Done. Though it'd be nice if someone would write a bot to put bloody {{book cover fur}} on the images, rather than just tagging them for deletion. But no, that would be helpful and contribute to a better Wikipedia; we can't have that(!) — OwenBlacker (Talk) 12:47, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] London Meetups - Sunday May 11th
We're hoping to have regular meetups in London. The next one is on May 11th Wikipedia:Meetup/London 9. Another Sunday lunch in Holborn. Come along! -- Harry Wood (talk) 11:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Glad to see you (maybe) signing up for Wikipedia:Meetup/London 9. Hope to see you tomorrow! -- Harry Wood (talk) 15:47, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:British coin 1p (1980).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:British coin 1p (1980).jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
-
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Removed incorrect call to {{non-free currency}} — OwenBlacker (Talk) 14:29, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Absolution Gap cover (Amazon).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Absolution Gap cover (Amazon).jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:09, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Done. Again, though, it would be nice if someone would write a bot that constructively leads to a better encyclopædia, say by adding {{book cover fur}} in an automated fashion, rather than destructively tagging images for deletion, leading to a less useful encyclopædia. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 08:49, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ac preussen.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ac preussen.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Removed incorrect copyright paranoia from Image page. The image in question is public domain and is on the Commons. This appears to be (yet another) bug in (yet another) bot. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 16:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Altered Carbon cover 1 (Amazon).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Altered Carbon cover 1 (Amazon).jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:36, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Done. I must get round to getting some kind of bot operating that will automate these pointless pieces of copyright paranoia. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 08:59, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Black Man cover (Amazon).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Black Man cover (Amazon).jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:49, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Done
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Broken Angels cover (Amazon).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Broken Angels cover (Amazon).jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Done
[edit] Consensus on reasoning for LGBT Project Articles
A new discussion you may be interested in:Consensus on reasoning for LGBT Project Articles. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 07:30, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User page layout
Hi there Owen, Ged from Thingbox here. I was wondering if you could give me a hand in organising my userpage, specifically the userboxes because yours are nice and organised and mine are a mess! I can't get the hang of table formatting on wiki, so any help would be greatly appreciated! Ged UK (talk) 09:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC)