Talk:Overs Piano
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Rating query
Reproduced below is my query to the editor who has ratedc this article as being of "low importance". Needless to say, I disagree! Does anyone else have a point of view about recording Australian contributions ot the development of pianos?
Fitzpatrickjm 14:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- the importance rating is to do with the importance of the article in relation to the matters that need to be included in wikipedia. I don't think wikipedia would be much reduced by the loss of this article. I note that the internet contains no uncommercial references to this brand of piano, except for a politician lobbying for a local interest.--Grahamec 11:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- Let us note for the record that Grahamec has been offered the opportunity to let all of us know his knowledge regarding pianos. He/she has declined to do so.
Grahamec should put up or shut up!
If he/ she doesn't know anything about pianos, then he/ she should have the good grace to admit that.
Overs activities are of significance, and I believe that would be acknowledged by persons with the requisite specialist knowledge.
Fitzpatrickjm 13:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Do you know anything about pianos?
I see that you have questioned the notability of the contribution regarding Overs Pianos.
I wonder if you could share with us your specialist knowledge and qualifications regarding this subject, which qualifies yo to rate the contribution of Overs to piano technology?
Thank you
Fitzpatrickjm 14:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)