User talk:Outlanderssc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


In regard to your assertion that the page isaac binkovitz meets criteria for speedy deletion, i would like to point out that this article is twice as long as the one that was previously posted, contains corrections of major factual errors, and is overall a completely different article. it seems unfair that you have marked it for speedy deletion so, well, speedily, that there is not yet even a talk page for it, therefore no way to post objections to its consideration for speedy deletion.

There was more wordage, but not more content. He is still as unnoteworthy as he was when the page was originally deleted. It was also clear that the author spelled the name differently to avoid the bots picking up the new article, something that clearly implies some sort of premeditation.
And also, please sign your notes so I can reply on your talk page.

His name was spelled differently because it was misspelled before. I accept the judgement that he's not noteworthy enough and fair, but please don't imply that he or I intentionally abused posting power, because the reposting was 1. an honest attempt to rectify some factual errors and include more relevant content, and 2. not in any way associated with the first article inasmuch as the original poster and I had no communication on the subject prior to the reposting. The article was re-written from scratch with different content by a different person than the first with no premeditation.

Too bad you did so much work for a non-notable bio -

Thanks for adding the template to the Brother-in-law page. You might want to make a user page, too.--Anti-Anonymex2Come to my page! I've gone caliente loco! 20:43, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Using lowercase

I would like to notice that before you created the French Curve article, we already had the French curve article. So, I would suggest that in the future you do not use capitals in article titles except for the first letter and other cases requred by grammar (like names, which are obviously capital). Thank you for your addition. Oleg Alexandrov 22:28, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

If you look, you will find that I did not write the article French Curve, I merely removed the reference to its use in Computer drafting, which was innacurate. If you feel it needs additional editing, feel free to do so. --Outlander 11:54, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

Hey you are right! Both you and the contributor before you were redlinks, so I thought it was the same person. :) Sorry. Oleg Alexandrov 12:03, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] milky seas article

Thanks for the entry regarding our milky seas study.

I wanted to make a clarification, but didn't feel right editing the page about my own work.

It's not really correct that "no in-field observation of the phenomenon has been made, so the assertion of bioluminescence is conjectural". One of the coolest aspects of the study, and what really nailed it down, was that a ship was transiting through the region and reported entering and leaving the glowing seas at the exact locations that the boundaries appeared on the satellite. You can see some more info on this page, including a link to the full PDF of the article with a plot of the ship track...

Regards, Steve Haddock and Steve Miller

[edit] Wikiproject subproject notification (late, sorry)

Hi Outlanderssc. I'm contacting you because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality. This project is inactive but exists. Anyway, I recently created a project Wikipedia:WikiProject Pedophilia which by right ought to be subproject ot Sexology and sexuality. In fact, I was (properly) upbraided for creating this project without consulting the members of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality. (Sorry, I just plain forgot). Anyway, my questions and comments are:

  • Are you still an active member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality?
  • Hi! As a member of the (logical) parent project, you are invited to view, contribute to, oversee, and/or join the subproject Wikiproject Pedophilia.
  • Be aware that we have had a difficult birth and are considered by some to be inherently controversial, and may have some future controversies due to the sensitive nature of the material in our purview, although I hope not.
  • In the normal course of things, I would join WikiProject Sexology and sexuality and edit it to include Wikiproject Pedophilia as a subproject. Do you have any objections or comments on that.
  • We are considering renaming Wikipedia:WikiProject Pedophilia to Wikiproject Paraphilia, for various reasons. As a member of the parent project, do you have any thoughts on that?Herostratus 22:32, 16 February 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Grayson Space Navy

Hi. Some time ago, you proposed the page for Grayson Space Navy for speedy deletion, giving the reason as 'nonsense'. I know this is a long time in asking (...a year? Eeech), but may I ask why? Bengaley 12:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:72Corvorado.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:72Corvorado.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Barbara_Nitke_web.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Barbara_Nitke_web.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 08:39, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CHUDWAH

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article CHUDWAH, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of CHUDWAH. Accurizer (talk) 22:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bathroom Kiss.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bathroom Kiss.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:26, 21 May 2008 (UTC)