Template talk:Out of date

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] New image

This template used to use Image:Emblem-important.svg. A user recently replaced it with Image:Out of date clock pn.png which was quickly tagged to be converted to SVG. I made a similar one, Image:Out of date clock icon.svg, and also made this version Image:Out of date clock icon.svg. Which one do you think we should use? I labelled them A, B, C, and D. Perhaps a different version? What do you think? -- Tkgd2007 (talk) 02:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't know, I liked B because it had a subtle, softer look and goes with the icons we generally use here. C, and especially D are really dramatic and hard coded. I really don't have much of a preference but I prefer B. I could easily convert B into SVG graphics if that's a problem, but if C is preferred, I'd suggest toning down some of the colors and make it less bold.-- penubag  (talk) 04:40, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, the only reason I changed it was because it wasn't an SVG. If you could make an SVG version that would be great! I used the red clock because it already was an SVG, and the blue clock hasn't been made into an SVG yet by anybody. The ones I made do look pretty intense. -- Tkgd2007 (talk) 18:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
I've converted the blue clock into svg first since that image is the base for our other clock images, the only problem is that it looks like crap at 50px, observe now fixed. -- penubag  (talk) 04:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, I replaced the clock with a new version of the vector you made. I hope you like it! -- penubag  (talk) 03:39, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Untitled conversation

Shouldn't the text be "The factual accuracy of this article or section may be compromised due to out-of-date information." i.e. put the dashes between out-of-date? Spebudmak 22:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I think it's probably hopeless to get people to observe that rule, but for what it's worth, I agree with you :-). See also http://www.salisbury.gov.uk/style-guide.pdf and http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn?view=rev&revision=27366. --Karl Fogel 07:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)