Template talk:Out of date
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] New image
This template used to use Image:Emblem-important.svg. A user recently replaced it with Image:Out of date clock pn.png which was quickly tagged to be converted to SVG. I made a similar one, Image:Out of date clock icon.svg, and also made this version Image:Out of date clock icon.svg. Which one do you think we should use? I labelled them A, B, C, and D. Perhaps a different version? What do you think? -- Tkgd2007 (talk) 02:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know, I liked B because it had a subtle, softer look and goes with the icons we generally use here. C, and especially D are really dramatic and hard coded. I really don't have much of a preference but I prefer B. I could easily convert B into SVG graphics if that's a problem, but if C is preferred, I'd suggest toning down some of the colors and make it less bold.-- penubag (talk) 04:40, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, the only reason I changed it was because it wasn't an SVG. If you could make an SVG version that would be great! I used the red clock because it already was an SVG, and the blue clock hasn't been made into an SVG yet by anybody. The ones I made do look pretty intense. -- Tkgd2007 (talk) 18:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Untitled conversation
Shouldn't the text be "The factual accuracy of this article or section may be compromised due to out-of-date information." i.e. put the dashes between out-of-date? Spebudmak 22:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's probably hopeless to get people to observe that rule, but for what it's worth, I agree with you :-). See also http://www.salisbury.gov.uk/style-guide.pdf and http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn?view=rev&revision=27366. --Karl Fogel 07:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)