Talk:Outloud.tv

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

erhm I am most willing to follow any guidelines etcetera - but what's really wrong with the current page? 212.83.71.69 00:12, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Needs reliable sources

See WP:RS. A website is usually notable in its own estimation. We want to know if anyone else agrees. Surely if Outloud.tv is notable, someone in the media would have commented on it. Any independent press mentions would be useful. EdJohnston 00:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability

I think that the notability tag can be removed. Outloud.TV is simply the 'father of youtube' in every -technical- way. Started in 2003. Jupiter research said that the usage of automated Flash video conversion was key to the success of Youtube (that was 2005) Outloud did the same thing for 2 years already (2003). That pretty much makes it notable by itself. Let alone the fact that Outloud is still active AND broadcasts to local TV stations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.83.71.69 (talk • contribs) 14 July, 2007

I think there is no case for removing the notability tag. If they were a true precursor of Youtube, don't you think someone in the press would have noticed and commented on it? If you don't believe the notability tag is appropriate, I think the article should be considered for deletion, because I doubt that anyone is going to add sources. Please sign your comments using four tildes ~~~~ before hitting the 'Save Page' button. EdJohnston 22:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

It was noticed by local Dutch media (NRC Handelsblad, Parool, Salto) 21:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.57.125.170 (talk)