User talk:Osmium14
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/White Nationalism, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.
I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay.
You may want to read about the Five pillars of Wikipedia and simplified ruleset.
If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions.
For help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style.
If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ.
If you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)!
There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library.
Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal.
Feel free to post questions on my user talk page or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will be by to help you shortly.
If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Five will get you the datestamp only.
You may want to add yourself to the new user log.
If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
On IRC, check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.
If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
Happy Wiki-ing. —Kf4bdy talk contribs
PS: This is not a bot and you did nothing to prompt this message. This is just a friendly welcome by a fellow Wikipedian.
[edit] About the white article
Hello, Osmium 14 and welcome to Wikipedia. I see that you are a good editor who wants to improve Wikipedia. Well, the white people article does not conform to Wikipedia's standards. There are some people who want to see non-whites included in the white race. It is up to good-hearted editors like yourself to find credible sociological sources and cite them. Sociologists agree that the Jews have historically not been considered whites. To cite a source open up the page and type in <ref>author name. book name. date. websiteURL.(if applicable)</ref>. If you need, help I'll be glad to help you. Some editors may try to remove your edit, but they are not playing by Wikipedia's rules. Wikipedia:Neutral point of view is a policy that demands all verifiable sides of the issue be represented. Of course, the POV that Jews are not white is well verifiable, so they will not be able to justify removing it based on official policy. Make sure to get a source written by a sociologist, because they'll remove the citation if it comes from a white nationalist or otherwise a "bad" source. Remember, you will not be allowed to revert the article to your version more than three times in 24 hours or you'll get banned. You should encourage more kindred spirits to come on down to Wikipedia for the defense of the white race. --DarkTea 00:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] A new consensus on the white article
It is possible to make the white people article conform to the "majority's" view. Normally, if a person garnered like-minded people to his or her cause they would be accused of sock puppetry because their IPs will be shown to come from the same area. This is not a problem for a multiregional group whose IPs come from all over the US and Europe. If you and your multiregional supporters set up accounts on Wikipedia and held a majority on the article, Wikipedia's policy on consensus will allow the article to reflect the consensus of your group within the parameters of the governing laws. Currently, the white people article gives undue weight to the minority view that Middle Easterns are also white. As long as it is mentioned in passing for NPOV, your numerous fellowship can make the article arrive at a new consensus where this anti-white POV is further restricted.--DarkTea 16:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! --Nlu (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
