User talk:Osgiliath

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. dcandeto 15:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Xenno logo.gif listed for deletion

--Sherool (talk) 16:50, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:XennoBB logo.gif listed for deletion

--Sherool (talk) 16:50, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandals

If someone is vandalising articles you can add the {{test}}, {{test2}} or even {{test3}} templates to their Talk pages. Administrators are unable to block vandals who have not been warned. The Land 10:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attack

Hi. You may have not understand my purpose : I do not attack you directly, I attack your software. So please stop trying to scare me, it's unsuccessful. I'd be happy to see administrator look at your article and my luinks about what I attack you on. Oh and stop insulting me will help you. Draky 13:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Civility

I have noticed you have made some comments on talk pages that could be construed as incivil. Please remain WP:CIVILcivil and stay cool when discussing issues. Thank you! --Ginkgo100 ^{talk · e@} 19:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comments on WP:AIV

Here are the comments from that discussion restored here.

Draky (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) This user added a lot of links spam and incorrect statements onto the XennoBB talk page. He also stated that his only intent is to leave the comments so they cannot be removed (his statements are based on a blog post). - Osgiliath 19:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

unsure about this, discussions on talk pages is not a reason to block. Reporting user is engaged in ongoing dispute with Draky. --Oscarthecat 19:50, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok so I can add to somebody's page that he's a pedophyle and that comment will stay? I'd say this is a serious problem... - Osgiliath 19:53, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

It may well be a violation of any number of Wiki rules including WP:NPA, WP:CIV, and WP:AGF, but it's not vandalism. If you wish, take this to the "incidents" portion of the Administrator's Noticeboard.

Atlant 20:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

And my response: You might want to read WP:VANDAL to get a definition of what is considered vandalism and what isn't. The dispute resolution process might be a better outlet for you. I removed the discussion from WP:AIV because it was not relevant. --Ginkgo100 ^{talk · e@} 20:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)